IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] working group adoption call for draft-kklf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light-01

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 06 May 2016 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4155612D0DA for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:06:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nvpo6raREla1 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:06:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0093A12D0BD for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1aynsy-0005Vj-1a; Fri, 06 May 2016 22:06:12 +0000
Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 07:06:10 +0900
Message-ID: <m2lh3mlu3x.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_iJLZ6T5MQYigEiXcDL21dUkiHT2hezpbq1W8ttet8722A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <13075573-8AFA-41D7-B0A3-E2B94DF78E61@tislabs.com> <CAL9jLaa6rcJ42cFyJEW1XTcvMfqnLr++VE7kHgpOG1ywL4S1JA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.WNT.2.00.1605051758070.2308@mw-PC> <CAL9jLaY355-o1yF+whryMNWTJTyET_d082ZTBapE0CtaVdy3Wg@mail.gmail.com> <22b44efa-bd76-0feb-d1ad-2c5b5c3b845c@gmail.com> <CAL9jLabareh=4_nHMUO2GT8kB94J8yRX3HOJCqU6z3P5iOAPbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHw9_iJLZ6T5MQYigEiXcDL21dUkiHT2hezpbq1W8ttet8722A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/HypwA_bzs8wseq49sZJE0OuF3DY>
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] working group adoption call for draft-kklf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light-01
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 22:06:15 -0000

> Some people do use route servers, and won't do their own validation -
> I'd rather that they have the information available to make a decision
> than not...

this glibly glosses over that, by outsourcing origin validation, an
attack vector is introduced.  i presume i do not need to describe it.
so it needs to be big in the sec cons.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email