Re: [sidr] working group adoption call for draft-kklf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light-01

Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de> Thu, 05 May 2016 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AB212D6EA for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2016 09:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zb63M6PQjK1T for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2016 09:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AEF212D515 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 May 2016 09:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (envelope-from <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>) id <1ayLjA-000ohP-I4>; Thu, 05 May 2016 18:02:12 +0200
Received: from x5ce7e3e9.dyn.telefonica.de ([92.231.227.233] helo=mw-PC.fritz.box) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (envelope-from <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>) id <1ayLjA-003qp6-7c>; Thu, 05 May 2016 18:02:12 +0200
Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 18:01:53 +0200
From: Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaa6rcJ42cFyJEW1XTcvMfqnLr++VE7kHgpOG1ywL4S1JA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1605051758070.2308@mw-PC>
References: <13075573-8AFA-41D7-B0A3-E2B94DF78E61@tislabs.com> <CAL9jLaa6rcJ42cFyJEW1XTcvMfqnLr++VE7kHgpOG1ywL4S1JA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (WNT 1167 2008-08-23)
X-X-Sender: waehl@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="253818414-31862-1462463891=:2308"
Content-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1605051758210.2308@mw-PC>
X-Originating-IP: 92.231.227.233
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/bwFJhDpRARbaA7hIdmow6e6fXe4>
Cc: sidr <sidr@ietf.org>, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] working group adoption call for draft-kklf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light-01
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 16:02:17 -0000

Hi Chris,

  I'm not sure if I get your point.

On Thu, 5 May 2016, Christopher Morrow wrote:

> I think it's an interesting topic to discuss, I'm a little worried 
> that: "Because the third party said things are 'ok' I'll believe 
> things are ok!"
> 
> mostly because I don't see a clear method to ensure that 'third party' has:
>   1) up-to-date information
>
  Same with RTR cache server.

>   2) my best interest at heart
>
  If you peer with a route server, you should establish a trust relation 
anyway.

>   3) current/appropriate configuration
> 
  Same with RTR cache erver.


Cheers
  matthias


-- 
Dr. Matthias Waehlisch
.  Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST
.  Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
.. mailto:m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
:. Also: http://inet.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net