IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Fwd: New Version Notificationfor draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles

"t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com> Tue, 25 October 2011 10:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBC621F85DB for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.252, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f390SjQzKOS1 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.btconnect.com (c2bthomr13.btconnect.com [213.123.20.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7818D21F85C7 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 03:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host86-163-151-98.range86-163.btcentralplus.com (HELO pc6) ([86.163.151.98]) by c2bthomr13.btconnect.com with SMTP id EWQ45150; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:35:51 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <041b01cc92f8$c9a3c640$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
References: <20110802092022.13671.96567.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com><1C1A5E2A-1C8A-4023-B2BA-A2D340470649@cisco.com><p06240807ca5e0bcbcee5@[192.168.1.12]><B02911FA-F807-4A6F-837A-205236B02325@cisco.com><m239hiqa4p.wl%randy@psg.com> <4E3A9A65.4010207@ieca.com><Pine.WNT.4.64.1108051408150.6664@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com><4E3C503D.2050004@ieca.com><EE05681A-CC67-4417-A335-379E7DB90338@cisco.com> <4EA4943F.80106@ieca.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:30:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A0B0302.4EA69106.00A9, actions=tag
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50, refid=2.7.2:2011.10.25.93015:17:7.586, ip=86.163.151.98, rules=__HAS_MSGID, __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1, __SANE_MSGID, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, CT_TP_8859_1, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __URI_NO_PATH, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_1200_1299, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __OUTLOOK_MUA, RDNS_SUSP, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=c2bthomr13.btconnect.com
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B0202.4EA6910B.00CF, ss=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=multiengine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Fwd: New Version Notificationfor draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:35:59 -0000

Sean

I would get less confused if you referred to draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs as
[ID.sidr-res-certs] and not as [ID.sidr-res-cert-profile] ; there are so many
sidr I-Ds and name changes and I lose track of what is which even without two
similar but different names for one of them:-(

"o BGPSEC Router Certificates MUST include the BGPSEC EKU defined in
      Section 3.9.5."
Should that be 3.1.3.1? (or is it a section in
draft-ietf-sidr-res-cert-profile:-)

And I find it hard to parse
' The validation procedure used for BGPSEC Router Certificates is
   identical to the validation procedure described in Section 7 of
   [ID.sidr-res-cert-profile] except that where "this specification"
   refers to [ID.sidr-res-cert-profile] in that profile in this profile
   "this specification" is this document.'

Perhaps
' The validation procedure used for BGPSEC Router Certificates is
   identical to the validation procedure described in Section 7 of
   [ID.sidr-res-cert-profile] except that "this specification"
  should be taken as referring to this document.'

I would find it clearer still if draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs section 7
used 'this profile' instead of 'this specification'

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Turner" <turners@ieca.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email