Re: [sidr] draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-00.txt

Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net> Thu, 07 June 2012 02:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bje@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B40421F8694 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4b3DBi0fqRvP for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp.apnic.net (asmtp.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dc0:2001:11::199]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2906821F8693 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 19:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:dc0:a000:4:8cd8:4e3a:2c:77f4] (unknown [IPv6:2001:dc0:a000:4:8cd8:4e3a:2c:77f4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asmtp.apnic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C517EB673A; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:58:19 +1000 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0B67F11A-7EC9-492F-B473-E3B58A34DD45"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
From: Byron Ellacott <bje@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <m28vg0lev7.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:58:19 +1000
Message-Id: <A38D2919-6E97-454E-98F1-58054E5991C0@apnic.net>
References: <20120606135903.5473.73476.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m28vg0lev7.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-00.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 02:58:24 -0000

Hi Randy,

Why does the draft require that C's certificate not be modified to reflect the update in recorded holder of the INRs at A?  That would seem to be in disagreement with RFC 6484, to me.

  Byron

On 07/06/2012, at 12:00 AM, Randy Bush wrote:

> this draft is relevant to the sidr wg work and i, as author, request it
> be made a work item.
> 
> randy