Re: [sidr] wglc draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-00

Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Mon, 15 July 2013 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@arin.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEBA21E80F6 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h5yrdwCXSNDM for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.arin.net (smtp1.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563A421E80FD for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id 971011650BC; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:07:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ASHXCH01.corp.arin.net (ashxch01.corp.arin.net [199.43.0.17]) by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E601165068; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:07:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.19) by ASHXCH01.corp.arin.net (199.43.0.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.421.2; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:07:44 -0400
Received: from CHAXCH02.corp.arin.net ([169.254.2.236]) by CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net ([10.1.30.19]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:07:43 -0400
From: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
To: "Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com>, "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] wglc draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-00
Thread-Index: Ac5/P7KlsWW9gua6S/mEz+yRY2Jx6ACSJbqA///q8YA=
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 17:07:21 +0000
Message-ID: <CE09A41F.268E1%andy@arin.net>
In-Reply-To: <EF4348D391D0334996EE9681630C83F022120B93@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515
x-originating-ip: [10.1.1.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <82EAECBB669F084E8DA412C2075ABB8B@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] wglc draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-00
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 17:07:53 -0000

On 7/15/13 10:22 AM, "Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com>
wrote:

>Before sending my support to advance to the IESG, I wanted to ask the
>author if they have tested the effects of this change on existing RP
>tools. Do they really set the certificate as invalid?

Yes, we have tested against the three RP suites. One did not require a
change while the other two required simple one line changes. Current
releases of all three now accommodate it.

-andy