[sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7080)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 10 August 2022 21:06 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8951C1907B4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z_tzpgT73b31 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F9DC13D06E for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 1A9504C29D; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: madi@zdns.cn, david@mandelberg.org, tim@nlnetlabs.nl, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jgs@juniper.net, andrew-ietf@liquid.tech, morrowc@ops-netman.net, sandy@tislabs.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: benm@workonline.africa, sidr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220810210643.1A9504C29D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:06:43 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/td6-fsKRq1u29JGQkpmc7D-ZL7I>
Subject: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7080)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:06:47 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8416, "Simplified Local Internet Number Resource Management with the RPKI (SLURM)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7080 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Ben Maddison <benm@workonline.africa> Section: 3.4.2 Original Text ------------- The above is expressed as a value of the "bgpsecAssertions" member, as an array of zero or more objects. Each object MUST contain one each of all of the following members: o An "asn" member, whose value is a number. o An "SKI" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without trailing '=' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the certificate's Subject Key Identifier as described in Section 4.8.2 of [RFC6487] (This is the value of the ASN.1 OCTET STRING without the ASN.1 tag or length fields.) o A "routerPublicKey" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without trailing '=' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the equivalent to the subjectPublicKeyInfo value of the router certificate's public key, as described in [RFC8208]. This is the full ASN.1 DER encoding of the subjectPublicKeyInfo, including the ASN.1 tag and length values of the subjectPublicKeyInfo SEQUENCE. Corrected Text -------------- The above is expressed as a value of the "bgpsecAssertions" member, as an array of zero or more objects. Each object MUST contain one each of all of the following members: o An "asn" member, whose value is a number. o An "SKI" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without trailing '=' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the certificate's Subject Key Identifier as described in Section 4.8.2 of [RFC6487] (This is the value of the ASN.1 OCTET STRING without the ASN.1 tag or length fields.) o A "routerPublicKey" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without trailing '=' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the equivalent to the subjectPublicKeyInfo value of the router certificate's public key, as described in [RFC8208]. This is the full ASN.1 DER encoding of the subjectPublicKeyInfo, including the ASN.1 tag and length values of the subjectPublicKeyInfo SEQUENCE. In addition, each object MAY contain one optional "comment" member, whose value is a string. Notes ----- The "comment" member is allowed to appear in every other structure defined by the document, and was clearly intended to be allowed here too, since it appears in the examples presented in sections 3.4.2 and 3.5 Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8416 (draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-08) -------------------------------------- Title : Simplified Local Internet Number Resource Management with the RPKI (SLURM) Publication Date : August 2018 Author(s) : D. Ma, D. Mandelberg, T. Bruijnzeels Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Secure Inter-Domain Routing Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7080) RFC Errata System
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7… Ben Maddison
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7… Warren Kumari
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7… Ben Maddison
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7… Ties de Kock
- Re: [sidr] [Sidrops] [Technical Errata Reported] … Job Snijders
- Re: [sidr] [Sidrops] [Technical Errata Reported] … Job Snijders
- Re: [sidr] [Sidrops] [Technical Errata Reported] … Di Ma