[sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7080)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 10 August 2022 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8951C1907B4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z_tzpgT73b31 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F9DC13D06E for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 1A9504C29D; Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: madi@zdns.cn, david@mandelberg.org, tim@nlnetlabs.nl, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jgs@juniper.net, andrew-ietf@liquid.tech, morrowc@ops-netman.net, sandy@tislabs.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: benm@workonline.africa, sidr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20220810210643.1A9504C29D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 14:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/td6-fsKRq1u29JGQkpmc7D-ZL7I>
Subject: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7080)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 21:06:47 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8416,
"Simplified Local Internet Number Resource Management with the RPKI (SLURM)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7080

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Ben Maddison <benm@workonline.africa>

Section: 3.4.2

Original Text
-------------
   The above is expressed as a value of the "bgpsecAssertions" member,
   as an array of zero or more objects.  Each object MUST contain one
   each of all of the following members:

   o  An "asn" member, whose value is a number.

   o  An "SKI" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without
      trailing '=' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the certificate's Subject
      Key Identifier as described in Section 4.8.2 of [RFC6487] (This is
      the value of the ASN.1 OCTET STRING without the ASN.1 tag or
      length fields.)

   o  A "routerPublicKey" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding
      without trailing '=' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the equivalent to
      the subjectPublicKeyInfo value of the router certificate's public
      key, as described in [RFC8208].  This is the full ASN.1 DER
      encoding of the subjectPublicKeyInfo, including the ASN.1 tag and
      length values of the subjectPublicKeyInfo SEQUENCE.


Corrected Text
--------------
   The above is expressed as a value of the "bgpsecAssertions" member,
   as an array of zero or more objects.  Each object MUST contain one
   each of all of the following members:

   o  An "asn" member, whose value is a number.

   o  An "SKI" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without
      trailing '=' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the certificate's Subject
      Key Identifier as described in Section 4.8.2 of [RFC6487] (This is
      the value of the ASN.1 OCTET STRING without the ASN.1 tag or
      length fields.)

   o  A "routerPublicKey" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding
      without trailing '=' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the equivalent to
      the subjectPublicKeyInfo value of the router certificate's public
      key, as described in [RFC8208].  This is the full ASN.1 DER
      encoding of the subjectPublicKeyInfo, including the ASN.1 tag and
      length values of the subjectPublicKeyInfo SEQUENCE.

   In addition, each object MAY contain one optional "comment" member,
   whose value is a string.


Notes
-----
The "comment" member is allowed to appear in every other structure defined by the document, and was clearly intended to be allowed here too, since it appears in the examples presented in sections 3.4.2 and 3.5

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8416 (draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Simplified Local Internet Number Resource Management with the RPKI (SLURM)
Publication Date    : August 2018
Author(s)           : D. Ma, D. Mandelberg, T. Bruijnzeels
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG