Re: [sidr] Injecting idea of "freshness of repository data" into BGP

Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Thu, 29 March 2012 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <danny@tcb.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C40821E8041 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.228, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MILLIONSOF=0.315, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PrZaQdu-oOEt for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dog.tcb.net (dog.tcb.net [64.78.150.133]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2D421E800F for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dog.tcb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id DBAAB268063; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:02:39 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from new-host-4.home (pool-98-118-240-226.clppva.fios.verizon.net [98.118.240.226]) (authenticated-user smtp) (TLSv1/SSLv3 AES128-SHA 128/128) by dog.tcb.net with SMTP; for sidr@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:02:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from danny@tcb.net)
X-Avenger: version=0.7.8; receiver=dog.tcb.net; client-ip=98.118.240.226; client-port=57079; syn-fingerprint=65535:48:1:64:M1460,N,W3,N,N,T,S MacOS 10.4.8; data-bytes=0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120328081939.GA19843@slice>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:02:24 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CA796250-4EA9-468D-BB4A-4C1187D2148F@tcb.net>
References: <20120328081939.GA19843@slice>
To: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Subject: Re: [sidr] Injecting idea of "freshness of repository data" into BGP
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:02:40 -0000

On Mar 28, 2012, at 4:19 AM, Jeffrey Haas wrote:

> Per my mic comment at IETF 83:
> During the San Diego interim session we had discussed potentially signaling
> in BGP the idea that a given AS may have fresher data available in its
> repository. 


Shouldn't this problem be solved in the resource certification infrastructure (i.e., RPKI) - signaling RPKI freshness in BGP and distributing to literally millions of routers seems like a REALLY bad idea to me.

-danny