Re: [sidr] Injecting idea of "freshness of repository data" into BGP

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Fri, 30 March 2012 10:14 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655BC21F8865 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a1HP3s23Hjl6 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386B421F8880 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 03:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-1390.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-1390.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.19.144]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5241308432; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:14:21 -0300 (UYT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaYYJ3GMZHiRi5-U=UCHhTD_sPsHRG8yx85=diC4W20JeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:14:21 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D210BBE5-C643-4FA9-AB86-DB14324CE89E@lacnic.net>
References: <20120328081939.GA19843@slice> <CA796250-4EA9-468D-BB4A-4C1187D2148F@tcb.net> <20120329072236.GA7311@slice> <61C7DEFD-B03F-42B2-B0FC-878E84C32629@ericsson.com> <20120329081625.GA9609@slice> <m262dnzlb0.wl%randy@psg.com> <20120329115714.GA18393@slice> <m21uobzkdn.wl%randy@psg.com> <20120329121824.GB18393@slice> <m2aa2zzelr.wl%randy@psg.com> <2C74399F-D505-4FF3-BD0D-57527E87784D@arin.net> <CAL9jLaYYJ3GMZHiRi5-U=UCHhTD_sPsHRG8yx85=diC4W20JeA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Injecting idea of "freshness of repository data" into BGP
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:14:43 -0000

On 30 Mar 2012, at 11:44, Christopher Morrow wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Also, the presentation given at SIDR and IEPG indicated the study was done with only one RPKI validator. We have all three running in our lab and have noticed differences in speed over a local network with the same repository. Before declaring the problem a universal issue with rsync, wouldn't a test with the other validators provide helpful data points?
>> 
> 
> is there a way to run all three from many points on the network and
> gather useful stats to graph/history/etc? (is this sort of thing a
> good idea? watching/storing/analyzing performance over history I mean)


	I think there is a way and it is a very good idea. We just need some CPU donations.

	I think some RIRs are willing to support the idea and to do some cross monitoring (but just speaking for myself). 

Regards,
.as

	

> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr