RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels

So does this mean that we will be starting an SUA IG?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sigtran-admin@ietf.org [mailto:sigtran-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> john.loughney@nokia.com
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 10:24 AM
> To: asveren@ulticom.com; sigtran@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels
>
>
> Hi Tolga,
>
> Under the good news/bad news department, the draft tracker shows that SUA
> was finally approved:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=search_
> list&search_job_owner=0&search_group_acronym=&search_status_id=&se
> arch_cur_state=&sub_state_id=6&search_filename=draft-ietf-sigtran-
> sua&search_rfcnumber=&search_area_acronym=&search_button=SEARCH
>
> What this means is usually editorial mistakes can be fixed, but
> big changes
> cannot.  However, I will defer all comments to the wisdom of our WG chair.
>
> John
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: sigtran-admin@ietf.org
> > [mailto:sigtran-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> > ext Tolga Asveren
> > Sent: 23 February, 2004 16:26
> > To: sigtran@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels
> >
> >
> >
> > Although I also believe fixing the label mechanism or
> > replacing it with an
> > alternative should be the ultimate goal (I also agree that if
> > it is to be
> > meant "optional", there should be a matching error code to
> > reject an ASPAC
> > with labels), IMO taking it out at this moment is maybe not
> > the best choice.
> > As far as I remember, label mechanism had problems, when
> > there is a multiple
> > SG configuration(?). As it is right now, it looks like
> > working for single SG
> > case, and practically has some use for such a configuration.
> >
> > I also agree that a draft is not carved on the stone and is subject to
> > change(afterall it is just a "draft") but considering that
> > SUA was held
> > mainly because of security procedures updates for so long time, the
> > situation is a bit different, i.e. people (at least some of
> > them) did not
> > expect any procedural changes there.
> >
> >    Tolga
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: sigtran-admin@ietf.org
> > [mailto:sigtran-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> > > john.loughney@nokia.com
> > > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 2:39 AM
> > > To: bidulock@openss7.org
> > > Cc: barryn@adax.com; sigtran@ietf.org; sgilchrist@connetcom.com
> > > Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels
> > >
> > >
> > > Brian,
> > >
> > > > What about removal?
> > >
> > > If people on the list accept it, with STRONG consensus & we could
> > > query any known implementations, I think this may be
> > possible - however
> > > I'd defer to Lyndon as WG chair to verify it.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > John
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sigtran mailing list
> > > Sigtran@ietf.org
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sigtran mailing list
> > Sigtran@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sigtran mailing list
> Sigtran@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran

_______________________________________________
Sigtran mailing list
Sigtran@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran