RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels
john.loughney@nokia.com Mon, 23 February 2004 15:27 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA02295 for <sigtran-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:27:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvHz3-0008Mu-Gq for sigtran-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:27:02 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1NFR1gL032167 for sigtran-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:27:01 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvHz2-0008MY-Ih; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:27:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AvHyJ-0008Li-O9 for sigtran@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:26:15 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA02274 for <sigtran@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:26:11 -0500 (EST)
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AvHyH-0005Cl-00 for sigtran@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:26:13 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AvHxJ-00058c-00 for sigtran@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:25:14 -0500
Received: from mgw-x4.nokia.com ([131.228.20.27]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AvHwN-00053k-00 for sigtran@ietf.org; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:24:15 -0500
Received: from esdks001.ntc.nokia.com (esdks001.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.120]) by mgw-x4.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i1NFOAH11211; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:24:10 +0200 (EET)
X-Scanned: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:24:01 +0200 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.13 2004020314 - RELEASE
Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks001.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id i1NFO1XY009658; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:24:01 +0200
Received: from mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.96) by esdks001.ntc.nokia.com 00fq6G4v; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:23:59 EET
Received: from esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh001.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.28]) by mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i1NFNr722077; Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:23:54 +0200 (EET)
Received: from esebe023.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.115]) by esebh001.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6747); Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:23:54 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:23:52 +0200
Message-ID: <DADF50F5EC506B41A0F375ABEB3206360143B74B@esebe023.ntc.nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels
Thread-Index: AcP6Gg/5ClYBlgTfSWi0lNsHaEw9uQABrCPg
To: asveren@ulticom.com, sigtran@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Feb 2004 15:23:54.0338 (UTC) FILETIME=[0C477420:01C3FA21]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: sigtran-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: sigtran-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sigtran@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Signaling Transport <sigtran.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sigtran@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran>, <mailto:sigtran-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Tolga, Under the good news/bad news department, the draft tracker shows that SUA was finally approved: https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=search_list&search_job_owner=0&search_group_acronym=&search_status_id=&search_cur_state=&sub_state_id=6&search_filename=draft-ietf-sigtran-sua&search_rfcnumber=&search_area_acronym=&search_button=SEARCH What this means is usually editorial mistakes can be fixed, but big changes cannot. However, I will defer all comments to the wisdom of our WG chair. John > -----Original Message----- > From: sigtran-admin@ietf.org > [mailto:sigtran-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of > ext Tolga Asveren > Sent: 23 February, 2004 16:26 > To: sigtran@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels > > > > Although I also believe fixing the label mechanism or > replacing it with an > alternative should be the ultimate goal (I also agree that if > it is to be > meant "optional", there should be a matching error code to > reject an ASPAC > with labels), IMO taking it out at this moment is maybe not > the best choice. > As far as I remember, label mechanism had problems, when > there is a multiple > SG configuration(?). As it is right now, it looks like > working for single SG > case, and practically has some use for such a configuration. > > I also agree that a draft is not carved on the stone and is subject to > change(afterall it is just a "draft") but considering that > SUA was held > mainly because of security procedures updates for so long time, the > situation is a bit different, i.e. people (at least some of > them) did not > expect any procedural changes there. > > Tolga > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sigtran-admin@ietf.org > [mailto:sigtran-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of > > john.loughney@nokia.com > > Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 2:39 AM > > To: bidulock@openss7.org > > Cc: barryn@adax.com; sigtran@ietf.org; sgilchrist@connetcom.com > > Subject: RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels > > > > > > Brian, > > > > > What about removal? > > > > If people on the list accept it, with STRONG consensus & we could > > query any known implementations, I think this may be > possible - however > > I'd defer to Lyndon as WG chair to verify it. > > > > thanks, > > John > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sigtran mailing list > > Sigtran@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > > > _______________________________________________ > Sigtran mailing list > Sigtran@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran > _______________________________________________ Sigtran mailing list Sigtran@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sigtran
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels john.loughney
- [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels Barry Nagelberg
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels Barry Nagelberg
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels john.loughney
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels john.loughney
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels Barry Nagelberg
- Re: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels Brian F. G. Bidulock
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels john.loughney
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels Tolga Asveren
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels john.loughney
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels Barry Nagelberg
- RE: [Sigtran] SUA v16: TID and DRM labels Barry Nagelberg