IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Simple] SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and... (new subject)

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 01 November 2012 23:00 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270BE21F9620 for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:00:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.999, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67aak60cE1QM for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [62.23.212.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210CD21F95F5 for <simple@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 16:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.61]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id qA1N03nb022739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 2 Nov 2012 00:00:22 +0100
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.46]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.61]) with mapi; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 00:00:21 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:00:20 +0100
Thread-Topic: [Simple] SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and... (new subject)
Thread-Index: Ac24bNChgK4YiBkyT+qj8JGiZCAiiAAFxTBQ
Message-ID: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE202D2F6F713@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <axjp925efdvel8fmpey6jc73.1351800528451@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <axjp925efdvel8fmpey6jc73.1351800528451@email.android.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.83
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, " simple@ietf.org" <simple@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Simple] SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and... (new subject)
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:00:57 -0000

So I guess that IETF has therefore abandoned RFC 5727.

OMA last asked for 6 header fields to be registered. As far as I understand they were told they needed a standards track RFC to do this. Identifying no need for cooperation tells me that IETF is quite happy they have their own version of the SIP specification.

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net]
> Sent: 01 November 2012 20:09
> To: Ben Campbell
> Cc: Olle E. Johansson; Bernard Aboba; DRAGE, Keith (Keith);
> simple@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Simple] SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and... (new subject)
> 
> Murray was the liaison person to the OMA from the IETF side. Murray
> recently discontinued his participation in the OMA (due to a job change).
> We discussed the need to appoint a new liaison person in the IAB and came
> to the conclusion that no new appointment is necessary; the required need
> to interact with the OMA had decreased over time.
> 
> Does anyone on this list believe that there is a need for cooperation with
> the OMA?
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> Sent from my ASUS Pad
> 
> Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> >On Nov 1, 2012, at 2:20 PM, "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> wrote:
> >
> >> What is the current relationship betwen OMA and the IETF? ANy
> cooperation, like between 3Gpp and the IETF?
> >>
> >
> >
> >There is a liaison, but I don't think it's been very active for a while
> now.
> >_______________________________________________
> >Simple mailing list
> >Simple@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email