IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Simple] SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Fri, 02 November 2012 12:28 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: simple@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A6B21F941A for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 05:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O55kBcuc76n1 for <simple@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 05:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A71121F93C1 for <simple@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 05:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b11so2785486lam.31 for <simple@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 05:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=HMOZXDPU4jBlHzl07NnST6vK6zd7iulxuUk82ggWCSE=; b=OXjskuqU0pEEgE/3Ku/sHCBwfzH9+FnTDrvisUlmfCnlNRyFpiX+C9EgSGNjcCKZA+ Hdw/5A1WktXXe5h44UvIoWExTsDfBlSfWWsj2ZbzpMbPHCcrRADgAJ0tWUxko50dp1uG sueAsXCBQGan5Pp5peMS7Ap5HlTOc9ee1Cf0GgtSowbFsylDFqu45qdpRcr5iuLsvo/+ VNYRTaXCKGEKuE+sU3H3WJDt/+oypukGabCG6G+DtCCIzaGzlIWIXIdlFIiZRBHaAjlD 1ZXBiV7v88Tau/YeyhYYi4JOdpCXwIocLI8D3uo2Z5oWwuo6zwFLnxln/v+XHUl5D4GL tGCw==
Received: by 10.152.109.145 with SMTP id hs17mr1538690lab.5.1351859282734; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 05:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.2.71 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 05:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <F07738BF-C267-43B6-BC5D-F129C95718AD@ag-projects.com>
References: <axjp925efdvel8fmpey6jc73.1351800528451@email.android.com> <E0C42E85-1C67-435E-BCB8-F8F980DD9FE4@edvina.net> <2C9DA935-CBBD-4DCF-A2A4-FF0139FB62B2@ag-projects.com> <CALiegfmBNCTxcK0ZVdWXToDsYLWgtp9vyprt6Yj0_C=81yFWQQ@mail.gmail.com> <4BB9B7CC-7866-4406-BE3B-20A266D34E53@ag-projects.com> <CALiegfmmbOtw6TLfMd5AS2iQLr1maxKi+8tjnaoDa9OQB8SxaQ@mail.gmail.com> <F07738BF-C267-43B6-BC5D-F129C95718AD@ag-projects.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:27:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfkpeRhQW=tJpy3A8q0-KG8dWs=in9WFmOnkBYEi7DyZ_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmvXizeV1s6e9331vFgbsP3KqEOL6W2W5exOi7zxLnEPrnAf/Y/2h8JsRNyTWxXUj89yzW+
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, "simple@ietf.org" <simple@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Simple] SIMPLE and OMA and 3Gpp and RCS and… (new subject)
X-BeenThere: simple@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions <simple.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple>
List-Post: <mailto:simple@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/simple>, <mailto:simple-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:28:04 -0000

2012/11/2 Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saul@ag-projects.com>:
> You misundertood. That how we did it *for now*. I never ever mentioned there shouldn't be a better way nor that this is how I (personally) would like SIMPLE presence to look like. But I can't just simply implement a solution which only works with myself. Hence the backwards compatibility.

"backwards compatibility" with what?


> I'd love to see a better model endorsed by SIMPLE and then happily implement it. I think we do share this goal :-)

Sure we agree here. The key is: reusing SIMPLE/XCAP specs? or making
something better from scratch (after learning from current SIMPLE/XMPP
specs)?


--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email