IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sip] INFO: A recap, sense of consensus and a proposal for direction.

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 25 October 2007 21:22 UTC

Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlA9j-0002to-2b; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:22:19 -0400
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IlA9g-0002pt-2f for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:22:16 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlA9f-0002o7-Mr for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:22:15 -0400
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com ([72.232.15.10] helo=nostrum.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlA9f-00075k-Dd for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:22:15 -0400
Received: from orthrus.local (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9PLM9pZ039718 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:22:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <47210901.5070104@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:22:09 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh)" <sanjsinh@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO: A recap, sense of consensus and a proposal for direction.
References: <8983EC086A9D954BA74D9763E853CF3E04183D84@xmb-rtp-215.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8983EC086A9D954BA74D9763E853CF3E04183D84@xmb-rtp-215.amer.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4594/Thu Oct 25 07:45:14 2007 on shaman.nostrum.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009
Cc: sip List <sip@ietf.org>, Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org

On 10/25/07 4:12 PM, Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh) wrote:
> Why does the call need to go away, if INFO is rejected? Isn't INFO not
> supposed to affect call state(s)?
>   

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-dialogusage-06.txt

/a


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email