IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Sip] Mutual subscriptions

"Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@cornfed.com> Thu, 25 October 2007 21:42 UTC

Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlAT5-0008J2-1o; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:42:19 -0400
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IlAT3-0008GH-PZ for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:42:17 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlAT3-0008G9-82 for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:42:17 -0400
Received: from smtpauth01.csee.onr.siteprotect.com ([64.26.60.145]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IlAT2-0007ga-Uq for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:42:17 -0400
Received: from cornfed (unknown [67.162.139.200]) (Authenticated sender: fwmiller@cornfed.com) by smtpauth01.csee.onr.siteprotect.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A771C8080; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:12:22 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Frank W. Miller" <fwmiller@cornfed.com>
To: 'Adam Roach' <adam@nostrum.com>, "'Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh)'" <sanjsinh@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:41:33 -0600
Message-ID: <01ba01c8174f$cfc134a0$6901a8c0@cornfed>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
In-Reply-To: <47210901.5070104@nostrum.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
Cc: 'sip List' <sip@ietf.org>, 'Dean Willis' <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Subject: [Sip] Mutual subscriptions
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org


Forgive me if this question has already been asked but...

In reading this draft over, which is very interesting, I observe that
for the case of mutual subscription, it would be much simpler to just
disallow the subscribed party to reuse the dialog for the incoming
subscription?

Thanks,
FM


-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Roach [mailto:adam@nostrum.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 3:22 PM
To: Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh)
Cc: sip List; Dean Willis
Subject: Re: [Sip] INFO: A recap,sense of consensus and a proposal for
direction.

On 10/25/07 4:12 PM, Sanjay Sinha (sanjsinh) wrote:
> Why does the call need to go away, if INFO is rejected? Isn't INFO not
> supposed to affect call state(s)?
>   

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-sipping-dialogusage-06.tx
t

/a


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip



_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email