IETF Logo Mail Archive

DTMF timing (was Re: [Sip] INFO ...)

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Thu, 01 November 2007 17:40 UTC

Return-path: <sip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ine1y-00066v-Ue; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:40:34 -0400
Received: from sip by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ine1w-00065T-LO for sip-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:40:32 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ine1w-00062p-8o for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:40:32 -0400
Received: from nylon.softarmor.com ([66.135.38.164]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ine1m-0002TQ-2x for sip@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:40:30 -0400
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (cpe-76-185-142-113.tx.res.rr.com [76.185.142.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by nylon.softarmor.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id lA1He0gj006471 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 12:40:01 -0500
In-Reply-To: <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D037DBFB@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net>
References: <8983EC086A9D954BA74D9763E853CF3E04183D84@xmb-rtp-215.amer.cisco.com> <63DAB754-7CAF-48DA-9E47-96905FE45E81@nostrum.com> <9EE99659-BC47-4F29-8C95-652A95D2EF7B@softarmor.com> <EFC02CB0-F640-49D1-8C51-349A909DC9D0@nostrum.com> <20C2BE8C-BBBF-474F-967D-81438FF4EDF0@softarmor.com> <472505F8.5090401@nostrum.com> <8FF0EFA1-77DA-4D68-9B34-2AB904C9ED42@softarmor.com> <47255D1A.30206@nostrum.com> <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC3022B33C132@mail.acmepacket.com> <472756C2.1010205@nostrum.com> <47277440.3050707@cisco.com> <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC3022B33C881@mail.acmepacket.com> <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D037DBFB@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <6A5ECF04-A5D5-494A-8542-79993361AC05@softarmor.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Subject: DTMF timing (was Re: [Sip] INFO ...)
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:39:52 -0500
To: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Cc: sip List <sip@ietf.org>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-BeenThere: sip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Session Initiation Protocol <sip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip>, <mailto:sip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sip-bounces@ietf.org

On Nov 1, 2007, at 6:07 AM, Elwell, John wrote:
> [JRE] Performance is a consideration with DTMF, because the speed with
> which the user receives a response from the server can have impact on
> the user experience. RFC 2833 is always likely to get through quicker.

That's an interesting assertion. While I'm inclined to agree that  
your assertion is likely to prove correct, I'm wondering: Does  
anybody out there have real-world measurements on this?

--
Dean


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sipping@ietf.org for new developments on the application of sip

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email