Re: [Sip] Binary Encoding for SIP

[neil quiogue <[e-mail]>]

I think what Cullen is proposing is to only send one type of MIME body part 
encoding (i.e., binary) instead of having multiple possible MIME encoding 
as specified on RFC3261/7.1.4.

Regards, Neil


--On dimanche 15 février 2004 09:03 -0800 Marc Petit-Huguenin 
<[e-mail]> wrote:

> I thought that binary body was already supported: RFC3261 section 7.4.1,
> third paragraph.
>
> Cullen Jennings wrote:
>>
>> I submitted a draft on binary encoding for SIP. This improves
>> interoperability, improves speed, decreases sizes of messages, and
>> generally makes life better for SIP which will no doubt eventually help
>> with World Hunger. I need feedback, please let me know:
>>
>> a) Yah, lets do it
>>
>> b) No this is a stupid ideas and here are the reasons why
>>
>> c) There has not been many list comments, this draft involves some very
>> complex issues. I need a year or two to develop an opinion on the single
>> sentence inside it.
>>
>> d) I agree with Cowboy Willis
>>
>> Until it arrives in the archives, you can find it at
>>
>> http://www.employees.org/~fluffy/ietf/draft-jennings-sip-mime-01.html
>>
>> or, if you prefer ASCII encodings of everything,
>>
>> www.employees.org/~fluffy/ietf/draft-jennings-sip-mime-01.txt
>>
>> Thanks, Cullen
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
> Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip
>





_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip