Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-keep
<marianne.mohali@orange-ftgroup.com> Fri, 17 April 2009 10:07 UTC
Return-Path: <marianne.mohali@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F059C3A6AED for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1x-eJnZtzn1h for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from R-MAIL2.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25BF3A69F9 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 03:07:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FTRDMEL2.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.41]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:09:06 +0200
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:09:05 +0200
Message-ID: <7DBAFEC6A76F3E42817DF1EBE64CB026065E7F6D@ftrdmel2>
In-Reply-To: <49E821C4.8010906@ericsson.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-keep
Thread-Index: Acm/J03htzEw6ohtSQaE6Wfp6fJwswAHRT2A
References: <49E7BF9D.10706@nostrum.com><B846208195B11F4EA16E16BE9DC8A9CC018E34A8@DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net> <49E821C4.8010906@ericsson.com>
From: marianne.mohali@orange-ftgroup.com
To: sipcore@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Apr 2009 10:09:06.0081 (UTC) FILETIME=[8A9A2910:01C9BF44]
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-keep
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:07:55 -0000
yes > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > *From:* sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] *On > Behalf Of *ext Adam Roach > *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 1:31 AM > *To:* SIPCORE > *Subject:* [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-keep > > [as chair] > > There was already a request for consensus around adopting the document > draft-holmberg-sip-keep on the SIP working group mailing list. The > call was for adopting it "as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)". The > specific call for consensus can be found here: > > <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg27141.html> > > There were 15 messages in support of doing so, and no objections. > > I'm asking a related but slightly different question: Given that > SIPCORE has a charter milestone for "Mechanism for indicating support > for keep-alives," do you think we should adopt draft-holmberg-sip-keep > as the basis for completing this milestone? As before, a simple "yes" > is fine; however, if you don't think we should adopt this document, > please provide rationale. > > /a > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > _______________________________________________ > sipcore mailing list > sipcore@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore > _______________________________________________ sipcore mailing list sipcore@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
- [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-… DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-… Francois Audet
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-… Bob Penfield
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-… Theo Zourzouvillys
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-… Schmidt, Christian 1. (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-… Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-… marianne.mohali