IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-keep

"Francois Audet" <audet@nortel.com> Thu, 16 April 2009 23:45 UTC

Return-Path: <AUDET@nortel.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF29B3A6E0B for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.796, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uYaKfFdNqt5Y for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcars04e.nortel.com (zcars04e.nortel.com [47.129.242.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA8F3A6EC1 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com (zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com [47.103.123.71]) by zcars04e.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.0/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id n3GNjBw18904; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:45:11 GMT
Received: from 47.103.119.44 ([47.103.119.44]) by zrc2hxm0.corp.nortel.com ([47.103.119.44]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:45:12 +0000
References: <49E7BF9D.10706@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <385AF033-31D8-477A-86A4-78414FD2CB46@nortel.com>
From: Francois Audet <audet@nortel.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <49E7BF9D.10706@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-1--374692296"; charset="utf-8"
thread-index: Acm+7WJdTCp0B1iBRZGKXjhQJL79vg==
MIME-Version: 1.0 (iPod Mail 5H11a)
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-keep
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:45:11 -0700
Cc: SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-keep
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:45:13 -0000

yes

On Apr 16, 2009, at 16:31, "Adam Roach" <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> [as chair]
>
> There was already a request for consensus around adopting the  
> document draft-holmberg-sip-keep on the SIP working group mailing  
> list. The call was for adopting it "as a WG document in RAI (WG  
> tbd)". The specific call for consensus can be found here:
>
> Â  <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg27141.html>
>
> There were 15 messages in support of doing so, and no objections.
>
> I'm asking a related but slightly different question: Given that  
> SIPCORE has a charter milestone for "Mechanism for indicating  
> support for keep-alives," do you think we should adopt draft- 
> holmberg-sip-keep as the basis for completing this milestone? As  
> before, a simple "yes" is fine; however, if you don't think we  
> should adopt this document, please provide rationale.
>
> /a
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email