IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sipcore-keep

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 16 April 2009 23:44 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9813A6C2A for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3bPsKJwXBVz for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770E53A6990 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.3.231] (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3GNjTQG032221 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:45:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <49E7C319.7090602@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:45:29 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Postbox 1.0b11 (Macintosh/2009041423)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <49E7BF9D.10706@nostrum.com> <28B7C3AA2A7ABA4A841F11217ABE78D6758C6061@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <28B7C3AA2A7ABA4A841F11217ABE78D6758C6061@FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sipcore-keep
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:44:19 -0000

Keith is, of course, correct. The document under discussion should be 
draft-holmberg-sipcore-keep. I apologize for the confusion.

/a

DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:
> While I understand the documents are substantially the same, it mught be better to ask the question of:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-holmberg-sipcore-keep-00.txt
>
> regards
>
> Keith
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> 	From: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adam Roach
> 	Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 12:31 AM
> 	To: SIPCORE
> 	Subject: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-keep
> 	
> 	
> 	[as chair]
> 	
> 	There was already a request for consensus around adopting the document draft-holmberg-sip-keep on the SIP working group mailing list. The call was for adopting it "as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)". The specific call for consensus can be found here:
> 	
> 	<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg27141.html>  <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg27141.html>
> 	
> 	There were 15 messages in support of doing so, and no objections.
> 	
> 	I'm asking a related but slightly different question: Given that SIPCORE has a charter milestone for "Mechanism for indicating support for keep-alives," do you think we should adopt draft-holmberg-sip-keep as the basis for completing this milestone? As before, a simple "yes" is fine; however, if you don't think we should adopt this document, please provide rationale.
> 	
> 	/a
> 	
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email