IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-keep

Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> Fri, 17 April 2009 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955723A69F6 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.391
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1nG1UqISE9aT for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF693A67F3 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:38:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id AD46D220A1; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:39:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-ae824bb0000024d5-1e-49e82212dcbd
Received: from esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 73B10220F5; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:30:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by esealmw127.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:29:26 +0200
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:29:26 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186D0245E; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:29:26 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D779E219F0; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:29:25 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F9021961; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:29:25 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <49E821C4.8010906@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:29:24 +0300
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
References: <49E7BF9D.10706@nostrum.com> <B846208195B11F4EA16E16BE9DC8A9CC018E34A8@DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <B846208195B11F4EA16E16BE9DC8A9CC018E34A8@DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Apr 2009 06:29:26.0570 (UTC) FILETIME=[DB0060A0:01C9BF25]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-keep
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:38:31 -0000

yes

/Sal
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] *On 
> Behalf Of *ext Adam Roach
> *Sent:* Friday, April 17, 2009 1:31 AM
> *To:* SIPCORE
> *Subject:* [sipcore] Call for Consensus: draft-holmberg-sip-keep
>
> [as chair]
>
> There was already a request for consensus around adopting the document 
> draft-holmberg-sip-keep on the SIP working group mailing list. The 
> call was for adopting it "as a WG document in RAI (WG tbd)". The 
> specific call for consensus can be found here:
>
>   <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip/current/msg27141.html>
>
> There were 15 messages in support of doing so, and no objections.
>
> I'm asking a related but slightly different question: Given that 
> SIPCORE has a charter milestone for "Mechanism for indicating support 
> for keep-alives," do you think we should adopt draft-holmberg-sip-keep 
> as the basis for completing this milestone? As before, a simple "yes" 
> is fine; however, if you don't think we should adopt this document, 
> please provide rationale.
>
> /a
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email