[sipcore] Reviewers needed for new music-on-hold technique

"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Wed, 17 August 2011 20:07 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9341F0C4C for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.96
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.96 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.361, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id op3dbKIPy-0d for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com (p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AE71F0C4A for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,241,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="202327713"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([]) by p-us1-iereast-outbound.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2011 16:08:00 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com) ([]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 17 Aug 2011 15:59:45 -0400
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([]) by DC-US1HCEX3.global.avaya.com ([]) with mapi; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:08:00 -0400
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>, "john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 16:06:27 -0400
Thread-Topic: Reviewers needed for new music-on-hold technique
Thread-Index: AQHMXRkmJGtO1i1bHkiyPkqXjzoA1g==
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F582F@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [sipcore] Reviewers needed for new music-on-hold technique
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:07:27 -0000

> From: Elwell, John [john.elwell at siemens-enterprise.com]
> I haven't reviewed it in detail, but I see there is no mention of
> RTCP. Perhaps it isn't really relevant, except that it provides
> another reason why the media server needs to supply an IP address and
> port - even though it will not receive RTP, it will receive RTCP. The
> RTCP port could be implicit or explicit.

I don't think I've mentioned this, but draft-worley-service-example-06
has updates to point out that allowing RTCP is useful.  See
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-worley-service-example-06 and
search for "RTCP".  These changes are carried forward into the
current -07 draft as well.

Do these changes suffice?