Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus:adopting draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite

+1
I think we need the WG item

/Sal
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat
> Sent: 5. joulukuuta 2009 2:26
> To: Adam Roach
> Cc: SIPCORE
> Subject: Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus:adopting
> draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite
>
> yes, adopt draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite
>
> 	Thanks,
> 	Paul
>
> Adam Roach wrote:
>   
>> [as chair]
>>
>> Regarding the following milestone on our charter:
>>
>>   Invite Transaction Handling Correction to IESG (PS)
>>
>> To fulfill this milestone, there are two potential problems that may 
>> need to be addressed. One of them relates to handling of 200-class 
>> responses to INVITE messages; the other relates to re-INVITE and 
>> target refresh handling.
>>
>> The first problem is addressed by an adopted working group item 
>> (draft-ietf-sipcore-invfix). We do not currently have an adopted item 
>> for the second problem.
>>
>> The chairs would like to solicit feedback from the group regarding 
>> adoption of draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite as a working group item 
>> to fix the second set of problems. Please comment on the SIPCORE 
>> mailing list. If you agree with this adoption, a simple note stating 
>> as much is
>> encouraged: we cannot determine consensus without feedback, and 
>> silence is not very informative.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> /a
>> _______________________________________________
>> sipcore mailing list
>> sipcore@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>