IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: adopting draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Sat, 05 December 2009 00:26 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FCB3A679C for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:26:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jqMGAEcY8CIb for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:26:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B3B3A65A6 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:26:01 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar4FAKM3GUtAZnwM/2dsb2JhbACZI6VzlyyEMwQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.47,344,1257120000"; d="scan'208";a="72132904"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2009 00:25:52 +0000
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB50Pq2J020424; Sat, 5 Dec 2009 00:25:52 GMT
Received: from xfe-rtp-212.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.100]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:25:52 -0500
Received: from [161.44.174.156] ([161.44.174.156]) by xfe-rtp-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:25:51 -0500
Message-ID: <4B19A88F.3030008@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:25:51 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Roach <adam@estacado.net>
References: <4B19A017.1090402@estacado.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B19A017.1090402@estacado.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Dec 2009 00:25:51.0672 (UTC) FILETIME=[80251B80:01CA7541]
Cc: SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: adopting draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:26:04 -0000

yes, adopt draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite

	Thanks,
	Paul

Adam Roach wrote:
> [as chair]
> 
> Regarding the following milestone on our charter:
> 
>   Invite Transaction Handling Correction to IESG (PS)
> 
> To fulfill this milestone, there are two potential problems that may 
> need to be addressed. One of them relates to handling of 200-class 
> responses to INVITE messages; the other relates to re-INVITE and target 
> refresh handling.
> 
> The first problem is addressed by an adopted working group item 
> (draft-ietf-sipcore-invfix). We do not currently have an adopted item 
> for the second problem.
> 
> The chairs would like to solicit feedback from the group regarding 
> adoption of draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite as a working group item to 
> fix the second set of problems. Please comment on the SIPCORE mailing 
> list. If you agree with this adoption, a simple note stating as much is 
> encouraged: we cannot determine consensus without feedback, and silence 
> is not very informative.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> /a
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status