[sipcore] 答复: Re: Call for consensus: adopting draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite
gao.yang2@zte.com.cn Mon, 07 December 2009 00:53 UTC
Return-Path: <gao.yang2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6853A6892; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:53:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.314
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.314 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-4.524, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KY76KxHxlP4L; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:53:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx6.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [63.218.89.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366143A672F; Sun, 6 Dec 2009 16:53:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx6.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 91102001811080; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 08:30:22 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.18] by [10.30.17.99] with StormMail ESMTP id 89005.4761360516; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 08:52:38 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse1.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id nB70rSm4067007; Mon, 7 Dec 2009 08:53:28 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from gao.yang2@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <4B19A88F.3030008@cisco.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OFF449ABE2.98275107-ON48257685.00040AF6-48257685.0004E346@zte.com.cn>
From: gao.yang2@zte.com.cn
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:52:38 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 2009-12-07 08:53:24, Serialize complete at 2009-12-07 08:53:24
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0004E33E48257685_="
X-MAIL: mse1.zte.com.cn nB70rSm4067007
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@estacado.net>, SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>, sipcore-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: [sipcore] 答复: Re: Call for consensus: adopting draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 00:53:55 -0000
+1 There topics(session state and dialog state after Re-INVITE) is a very long issue for SIP. And I think we need the WG item. As there is interworking problem for the absence of the normative document, the WG item would be "the sooner the better". Thanks, Gao =================================== Zip : 210012 Tel : 87211 Tel2 :(+86)-025-52877211 e_mail : gao.yang2@zte.com.cn =================================== Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> 发件人: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org 2009-12-05 08:25 收件人 Adam Roach <adam@estacado.net> 抄送 SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org> 主题 Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: adopting draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite yes, adopt draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite Thanks, Paul Adam Roach wrote: > [as chair] > > Regarding the following milestone on our charter: > > Invite Transaction Handling Correction to IESG (PS) > > To fulfill this milestone, there are two potential problems that may > need to be addressed. One of them relates to handling of 200-class > responses to INVITE messages; the other relates to re-INVITE and target > refresh handling. > > The first problem is addressed by an adopted working group item > (draft-ietf-sipcore-invfix). We do not currently have an adopted item > for the second problem. > > The chairs would like to solicit feedback from the group regarding > adoption of draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite as a working group item to > fix the second set of problems. Please comment on the SIPCORE mailing > list. If you agree with this adoption, a simple note stating as much is > encouraged: we cannot determine consensus without feedback, and silence > is not very informative. > > Thanks! > > /a > _______________________________________________ > sipcore mailing list > sipcore@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore > _______________________________________________ sipcore mailing list sipcore@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore -------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
- [sipcore] Call for consensus: adopting draft-cama… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: adopting draft-… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: adopting draft-… Shida Schubert
- Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: adopting draft-… Brett Tate
- Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus:adopting draft-c… Christer Holmberg
- [sipcore] 答复: Re: Call for consensus: adopting dr… gao.yang2
- Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus:adopting draft-c… Salvatore Loreto
- Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: adopting draft-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: adopting draft-… Gonzalo Camarillo