Re: [sipcore] Call for consensus: adopting draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite

[as chair]

Hearing significant support, and no objections, I declare consensus in 
favor of adopting this document. I have instructed the authors to submit 
a new version as draft-ietf-sipcore-reinvite.

Thank you.

/a

On 12/4/09 5:49 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
> [as chair]
>
> Regarding the following milestone on our charter:
>
>   Invite Transaction Handling Correction to IESG (PS)
>
> To fulfill this milestone, there are two potential problems that may 
> need to be addressed. One of them relates to handling of 200-class 
> responses to INVITE messages; the other relates to re-INVITE and 
> target refresh handling.
>
> The first problem is addressed by an adopted working group item 
> (draft-ietf-sipcore-invfix). We do not currently have an adopted item 
> for the second problem.
>
> The chairs would like to solicit feedback from the group regarding 
> adoption of draft-camarillo-sipcore-reinvite as a working group item 
> to fix the second set of problems. Please comment on the SIPCORE 
> mailing list. If you agree with this adoption, a simple note stating 
> as much is encouraged: we cannot determine consensus without feedback, 
> and silence is not very informative.
>
> Thanks!
>
> /a
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore