Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermediate Proxy

"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Thu, 02 December 2010 17:19 UTC

From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>, "youssef.chadli@orange-ftgroup.com" <youssef.chadli@orange-ftgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 12:19:46 -0500
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermediate Proxy
Thread-Index: AcuGucJgDasXXQisTj27OAMu8zhX2wHA82BUASHjmBs=
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A74@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101CD7EE2@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr><4C7FDBEE.6080305@nostrum.com>, <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB85352642141020FD443@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B22022889B6@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com><9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214102155080@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4CD16A52.7090006@cisco.com> <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB853526421410221B4E3@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4CD53DFC.8020401@cisco.com> <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB85352642141022A9552@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>, <4CE476E2.70801@cisco.com>, <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A058502C71893@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A058502C71893@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermediate Proxy
Precedence: list

________________________________________
From: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg [christer.holmberg@ericsson.com]

Not exactly the same case that Youssef is talking about, but every now and then I have had discussions that it would be useful to be able to re-negotiate the route set (not only the local/remote targets, but also the record-routes) during a dialog. E.g. in Outbound cases it could be used to move ongoing dialogs from a failed flow to another (it is not always possible to achieve it by using domain names and DNS).

No, I did not suggest that we start work on such functionality :)
_______________________________________________

You mean that the renegotiation would be initiated by an *intermediate* proxy.  That is extremely ugly!

Dale

[sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermediate P… youssef.chadli
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Adam Roach
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… youssef.chadli
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… youssef.chadli
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… youssef.chadli
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… youssef.chadli
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Christer Holmberg
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Christer Holmberg
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Christer Holmberg
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Christer Holmberg