Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermediate Proxy

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 02 December 2010 20:35 UTC

From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>, "youssef.chadli@orange-ftgroup.com" <youssef.chadli@orange-ftgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:33:46 +0100
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermediate Proxy
Thread-Index: AcuGucJgDasXXQisTj27OAMu8zhX2wHA82BUASHjmBsABsZ9LQ==
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A058502C718D9@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101CD7EE2@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr><4C7FDBEE.6080305@nostrum.com>, <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB85352642141020FD443@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B22022889B6@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com><9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214102155080@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4CD16A52.7090006@cisco.com> <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB853526421410221B4E3@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4CD53DFC.8020401@cisco.com> <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB85352642141022A9552@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>, <4CE476E2.70801@cisco.com>, <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A058502C71893@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>, <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A74@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288A74@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermediate Proxy
Precedence: list

Hi,

>>Not exactly the same case that Youssef is talking about, but every now and then I have had discussions that it would be useful to be able to re-negotiate the route set (not only the local/remote targets, but also the record-routes) during a dialog. E.g. in Outbound cases it could be used to move ongoing dialogs 
>>from a failed flow to another (it is not always possible to achieve it by using domain names and DNS).
>>
>>No, I did not suggest that we start work on such functionality :)
>
>You mean that the renegotiation would be initiated by an *intermediate* proxy.  That is extremely ugly!

I agree. I later said that it would be good to have a response code which the proxy could send in order to trigger a renegotiation by the UA.

Regards,

Christer

[sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermediate P… youssef.chadli
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Adam Roach
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… youssef.chadli
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… youssef.chadli
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… youssef.chadli
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… youssef.chadli
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Christer Holmberg
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Christer Holmberg
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Christer Holmberg
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Worley, Dale R (Dale)
Re: [sipcore] Bypassing out-of-service intermedia… Christer Holmberg