[sipcore] #4: The new "hit" parameter is gonna cause problems

"sipcore issue tracker" <trac@tools.ietf.org> Wed, 25 August 2010 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0103A6A35 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1AbRi+wGOI-K for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9573A6A15 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <trac@tools.ietf.org>) id 1OoPg1-0008VQ-O7; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:46:41 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: sipcore issue tracker <trac@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.11.7
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.11.7, by Edgewall Software
To: hkaplan@acmepacket.com
X-Trac-Project: sipcore
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:46:41 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/sipcore/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/sipcore/trac/ticket/4
Message-ID: <064.f8bb79c01723e8d8b3653963f8e4727a@tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 4
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: hkaplan@acmepacket.com, sipcore@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: sipcore@ietf.org
Subject: [sipcore] #4: The new "hit" parameter is gonna cause problems
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 23:46:12 -0000

#4: The new "hit" parameter is gonna cause problems
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
 Reporter:  hkaplan@…               |       Owner:            
     Type:  defect                  |      Status:  new       
 Priority:  major                   |   Milestone:  milestone1
Component:  rfc4244bis              |     Version:  2.0       
 Severity:  In WG Last Call         |    Keywords:            
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
 If I understand it right, this draft creates a new SIP/SIPS URI param
 named "hit", whose value indicates the type of H-I entry that will be
 added when processing the SIP/SIPS URI as a target.  It's used in the
 Contact-URI of a 3xx, or location service database entries, to
 differentiate registered-contact targets vs. mapped targets, right?  In
 other words, it's a way to signify when the retargeting is simply routing
 to the same identity vs. diverting to a new identity, right?  (I am
 inferring this, since there's no text I can find that actually just says
 that in a simple sentence)

 If so, it's got issues.  First, it assumes the processor of the 3xx
 response actually understands the new param - if a legacy proxy sends a
 request to a H-I-capable redirect server, and the redirect server encodes
 this "hit" param in the contact-uri of the 3xx, bad things happen.
 Second, it accounts for SIP/SIPS but not TEL URIs.  Third, it should be a
 header param not a URI param, I think (which would solve the previous
 issues).

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/sipcore/trac/ticket/4>
sipcore <http://tools.ietf.org/sipcore/>