Re: [siprec] Adoption of material fromdraft-ram-siprec-metadata-format-02

Hi John,

One general comment/question I have received from web application savvy
coworkers with whom I have discussed the contents of this draft is that
the metadata is essentially a document and HTTP already has well defined
mechanisms for document sharing and updating, so why not exchange an
HTTP address for the document and leverage those mechanisms instead of
sending all the metadata within SIP messages. My assumption is that the
requirement is to have a SIP based solutions that does not require an
HTTP server. Is that accurate?

Thanks,
Charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: siprec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:siprec-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Elwell, John
> Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 4:02 AM
> To: siprec@ietf.org
> Subject: [siprec] Adoption of material
fromdraft-ram-siprec-metadata-format-02
> 
> Although there are some open issues, to be discussed during Thursday's
call, I would like the WG to
> consider whether material in draft-ram-siprec-metadata-format-02 is
ready for adoption into draft-
> ietf-siprec-metadata, i.e., bring it under WG control. In particular,
between now and the call, please
> consider whether:
> - the material is heading roughly in an acceptable direction;
> - there are any issues that really should be closed before adoption;
> - there are any aspects of the draft that should not be adopted at
this time.
> 
> If, on the call or shortly afterwards, we can agree on adoption, the
authors of the two drafts would
> be asked to perform a merger and publish a new version of
draft-ietf-siprec-metadata before the cut-
> off for IETF#81 (2011-07-11).
> 
> John
> _______________________________________________
> siprec mailing list
> siprec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec