Re: [siprec] Adoption of material from draft-ram-siprec-metadata-format-02

"Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com> Fri, 24 June 2011 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E0921F8598 for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.567
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.032, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1HxktnDlGk4 for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail182.messagelabs.com (mail182.messagelabs.com [85.158.139.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CA0521F8592 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 02:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-182.messagelabs.com!1308908548!9929122!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.17; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [62.134.46.10]
Received: (qmail 8161 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2011 09:42:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO senmx12-mx) (62.134.46.10) by server-3.tower-182.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 24 Jun 2011 09:42:28 -0000
Received: from MCHP064A.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.37.63]) by senmx12-mx (Server) with ESMTP id 347B923F03E2 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:42:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP058A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.57]) by MCHP064A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.63]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:42:28 +0200
From: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
To: "siprec@ietf.org" <siprec@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:42:26 +0200
Thread-Topic: Adoption of material from draft-ram-siprec-metadata-format-02
Thread-Index: AcwvOXaZg+4+wDzBQu2PC/LOxWkIwADGO23Q
Message-ID: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA08C66D8FD7@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
Keywords: SIPREC
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [siprec] Adoption of material from draft-ram-siprec-metadata-format-02
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/siprec>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 09:42:30 -0000

On yesterday's call there was no objection to adopting the material from metadata-format-02 (updated in line with agreements at the meeting) into draft-ietf-siprec-metadata. Also there has not been any objection on the list. So please raise any concerns THIS WEEK. On Monday I intend to instruct the authors of the two drafts to commence the merger.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elwell, John 
> Sent: 20 June 2011 12:02
> To: siprec@ietf.org
> Subject: Adoption of material from draft-ram-siprec-metadata-format-02
> 
> Although there are some open issues, to be discussed during 
> Thursday's call, I would like the WG to consider whether 
> material in draft-ram-siprec-metadata-format-02 is ready for 
> adoption into draft-ietf-siprec-metadata, i.e., bring it 
> under WG control. In particular, between now and the call, 
> please consider whether:
> - the material is heading roughly in an acceptable direction;
> - there are any issues that really should be closed before adoption;
> - there are any aspects of the draft that should not be 
> adopted at this time.
> 
> If, on the call or shortly afterwards, we can agree on 
> adoption, the authors of the two drafts would be asked to 
> perform a merger and publish a new version of 
> draft-ietf-siprec-metadata before the cut-off for IETF#81 
> (2011-07-11).
> 
> John