Re: [siprec] Can an MS object span several CSs in a CSG?

"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> Tue, 24 May 2011 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rmohanr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: siprec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF42E0770 for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.134
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.134 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.465, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6BvL+vOLQmlx for <siprec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E7FE0752 for <siprec@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 May 2011 09:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=rmohanr@cisco.com; l=3146; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1306254983; x=1307464583; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to; bh=UzVjnRwBtVP/+SBdXZwbcwl5fkSQbshRP81qCotC/zU=; b=cWaLMZhaf4p5LtL0O8Pc2BiBehB/t1n/yfrIRxT3ydjWlrSN80ixplk+ EDmLIOHhcS/DSRXT/m2CsGpRUNA3bDIQIcYN/CuD8TmN6abDIUUqbNjzj 1JKnErwMr8iTvPN5u4StKH+4Q57mno/pQ0i9l77zdoamO69WFYVkaOPfI k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AscAAF3e201Io8URgWdsb2JhbACXZY5EFAEBFiYlq22dd4YbBIZUjgiKTA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,261,1304294400"; d="scan'208";a="90469738"
Received: from bgl-core-2.cisco.com ([72.163.197.17]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 24 May 2011 16:36:05 +0000
Received: from xbh-bgl-411.cisco.com (xbh-bgl-411.cisco.com [72.163.129.201]) by bgl-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4OGa4pL020683; Tue, 24 May 2011 16:36:04 GMT
Received: from xmb-bgl-417.cisco.com ([72.163.129.213]) by xbh-bgl-411.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 24 May 2011 22:06:04 +0530
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:06:01 +0530
Message-ID: <35BCE99A477D6A4986FB2216D8CF2CFD067EECD7@XMB-BGL-417.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1CBF4C7095A3D4CAAAEAD09FBB8E08C04663764@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [siprec] Can an MS object span several CSs in a CSG?
Thread-Index: AcwZ5UbR730mQiXZRGSqd4Xx2cnzHgAHpFKQAAkglcAAAc/qEA==
References: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA089BE68795@MCHP058A.global-ad.net><A11921905DA1564D9BCF64A6430A6239055B0D70@XMB-BGL-411.cisco.com> <E1CBF4C7095A3D4CAAAEAD09FBB8E08C04663764@xmb-sjc-234.amer.cisco.com>
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>, "Parthasarathi R (partr)" <partr@cisco.com>, "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>, siprec@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2011 16:36:04.0133 (UTC) FILETIME=[AC79FD50:01CC1A30]
Subject: Re: [siprec] Can an MS object span several CSs in a CSG?
X-BeenThere: siprec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Recording Working Group Discussion List <siprec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/siprec>
List-Post: <mailto:siprec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec>, <mailto:siprec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:36:24 -0000

Charles,

I did bring about this specific usecase of MMOH/MOH stream being played
to different participants earlier and suggested that they have to
treated as a same MS across multiple CSs (potentially recorded using
multiple RSs).
Refer http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/siprec/current/msg01886.html

We had several discussions on it and it and several folks were in favor
of treating it as separate MS as there would be complexity in DB design.

Regards,
Ram


> -----Original Message-----
> From: siprec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:siprec-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 9:11 PM
> To: Parthasarathi R (partr); Elwell, John; siprec@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [siprec] Can an MS object span several CSs in a CSG?
> 
> Hi Partha,
> 
> Is an example of this the same music on hold audio stream existing as
> the same MS within multiple CSs? If so, then I understand your
> requirement to be that the SRC be able to indicate multiple instances
> of
> this audio stream within several CSs as being the same MS. Is that
> correct?
> 
> Thanks,
> Charles
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: siprec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:siprec-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Parthasarathi R (partr)
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 4:26 AM
> > To: Elwell, John; siprec@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [siprec] Can an MS object span several CSs in a CSG?
> >
> > John,
> >
> > I agree that it is not mandatory to consider recorded stream of a
> > specific participant in several CS within the same CSG as one
> recorded
> > stream but SIPREC protocol design MUST NOT restrict a SRC in case it
> > wishes to design in such a way.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Partha
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: siprec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:siprec-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf
> > Of Elwell, John
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 1:06 PM
> > To: siprec@ietf.org
> > Subject: [siprec] Can an MS object span several CSs in a CSG?
> >
> > We seem to have consensus that a Media Stream object represents a
> > recorded media stream, contributed to by one, several or all
> > Participants. However, Partha also wrote:
> >
> > "2) Each MS lifetime related to CSG because participant may move
from
> > one CS to another CS within single CSG and also CSG will span across
> > multiple RS."
> >
> > I am not sure we had resolved this during earlier discussions on the
> > scope of an MS object. Although the same Participant can participate
> in
> > several CSs within the same CSG, I don't think the recorded media
> > streams need to be considered the same. Any other views?
> >
> > John (as individual)
> > _______________________________________________
> > siprec mailing list
> > siprec@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec
> > _______________________________________________
> > siprec mailing list
> > siprec@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec
> _______________________________________________
> siprec mailing list
> siprec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/siprec