[Softwires] draft-cordeiro-softwire-experience-mapt

Dear Edwin,

Thank you for sharing the experiment results. 

I saw you made tests for torrent applications. FWIW, we had done an extensive testing of this application. The results of these testing are valid for all address sharing variants (including A+P): http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-pcp-bittorrent-00. This I-D provides an explanation for the failure you observed.

Cheers,
Med 

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : softwires-bounces@ietf.org 
>[mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de ecordeiro@nic.br
>Envoyé : lundi 17 septembre 2012 20:46
>À : softwires@ietf.org
>Objet : Re: [Softwires] Way forward with MAP-T and 4rd
>
>Hello Suresh and all,
>
>Regardind MAP-T we, at NIC.br, made some tests to verify the user  
>experience on a network using MAP-T.
>
>We published a draft with the results  
>(http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-cordeiro-softwire-experience-ma
>pt-00.txt).
>
>Any comments are welcome.
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Edwin Cordeiro
>NIC.br
>
>Quoting "Suresh Krishnan" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>   One of the followup questions we had after choosing the standards
>> track solution was to see what the wg wanted to do with the other two
>> solutions (MAP-T and 4rd). The sense of the room was that 
>the wg was in
>> favor of not abandoning them. We have not verified this 
>formally in the
>> ML and we have not worked out the exact logistics of how we will go
>> about pursuing the other solutions. The chairs will get this process
>> started by the end of this week with a set of questions to the wg.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Suresh & Yong
>> _______________________________________________
>> Softwires mailing list
>> Softwires@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Softwires mailing list
>Softwires@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>