Re: [Softwires] Way forward with MAP-T and 4rd

ecordeiro@nic.br Mon, 17 September 2012 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ecordeiro@nic.br>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD33E21F8610 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6zMF9Ek-Fddv for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.br (mail.cgi.br [IPv6:2001:12ff:0:4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE7621F852C for <softwires@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.nic.br (Postfix, from userid 33) id 3F43E20805C1; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:46:00 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from 200-185-250-174.user.ajato.com.br (200-185-250-174.user.ajato.com.br [200.185.250.174]) by mail.nic.br (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:46:00 -0300
Message-ID: <20120917154600.13201ablgpxj2lew@mail.nic.br>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:46:00 -0300
From: ecordeiro@nic.br
To: softwires@ietf.org
References: <5051079E.7060706@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5051079E.7060706@ericsson.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.7)
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Way forward with MAP-T and 4rd
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:46:04 -0000

Hello Suresh and all,

Regardind MAP-T we, at NIC.br, made some tests to verify the user  
experience on a network using MAP-T.

We published a draft with the results  
(http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-cordeiro-softwire-experience-mapt-00.txt).

Any comments are welcome.

Best Regards,

Edwin Cordeiro
NIC.br

Quoting "Suresh Krishnan" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>:

> Hi all,
>   One of the followup questions we had after choosing the standards
> track solution was to see what the wg wanted to do with the other two
> solutions (MAP-T and 4rd). The sense of the room was that the wg was in
> favor of not abandoning them. We have not verified this formally in the
> ML and we have not worked out the exact logistics of how we will go
> about pursuing the other solutions. The chairs will get this process
> started by the end of this week with a set of questions to the wg.
>
> Thanks
> Suresh & Yong
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>