IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6

"Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com> Thu, 16 February 2012 03:57 UTC

Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC1E21E8021 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:57:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.584
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.584 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.750, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PIP6pUQfsyBh for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:57:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com [76.96.32.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4367221E800E for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:57:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([24.40.56.116]) by copdcavout01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id C7WM3M1.6347303; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:46:55 -0700
Received: from PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::a5b0:e5c4:df1b:2367]) by pacdcexhub03.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::5527:6d6b:29a7:f414%15]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:56:58 -0500
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6
Thread-Index: AQHM7F8HXLvfeMOpWU6APi1d8wpLmA==
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:56:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CB61E7C0.1CA20%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFUBMqU6DwZr6SJsKDGWy+hTXks_XEt9WFBGfr9DzmaMHYQFAA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121
x-originating-ip: [24.40.55.72]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3412191414_1269373"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 03:57:08 -0000

Hi Maoke,

There are always trade-offs. We can suggest few options and ask the WG to
choose one. 

1) Let the host to reassemble the fragmented packets
2) Let the 4o6 TC to assemble the fragmented packets
3) Don¹t suggest anything and leave this open for implementation

/Yiu


From:  Maoke <fibrib@gmail.com>
Date:  Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:50:33 +0900
To:  "Yiu L. LEE" <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
Cc:  Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com>, "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject:  Re: [Softwires] [softwire] Merged version of lightweight 4over6

the "since we believe" is true in the term that client/server model is
dominating the Internet usage. but the situation is changing, AFTR might
suffer a heavy burden with reassembly in the environment where p2p is
dominating. can we (actually you authors) surely state lightweight 4over6
improves this? if we can, it is a happy point. ;-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email