Re: [Softwires] MAP documents - next steps

Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> Tue, 31 January 2012 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EDC21F855E for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:28:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sgvrsmCeZY3W for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:28:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B70421F85A1 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:28:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pbdy7 with SMTP id y7so209904pbd.31 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:28:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=5Z5Fv9uxKzoLA7tygxukYD5tGmgH+UubyGrdp8e0pEU=; b=jpOnCh2No2iMIgyL7cSPnDcDdbiELwddOLSDFtxSdvV7/JDdtJkGx+cRo0eRUpOszr Pso8CFwge+qt95pP2rPP6V8AsPILpDSmf8YNU3rDCYO5ghAvVM9xRHBw+i596taL5UM3 iT/vo+zwR4fI+yqimld1p9flSBPZ2Vu4T046g=
Received: by 10.68.216.4 with SMTP id om4mr32954957pbc.19.1328016502442; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:28:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2400:21dd:2684:200:6963:c454:e4d7:2c92? ([2400:21dd:2684:200:6963:c454:e4d7:2c92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z5sm55460400pbc.5.2012.01.31.05.28.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 05:28:21 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
From: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5AAB067C-B5EF-4F75-B844-AFC33A96261C@employees.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:28:17 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F6A831A9-D0D1-44E2-8DE9-A1FE22BDB87F@gmail.com>
References: <5AAB067C-B5EF-4F75-B844-AFC33A96261C@employees.org>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Ole_Tr=C3=B8an?= <otroan@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] MAP documents - next steps
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:28:24 -0000

Hi, I'm in favor of the MAP documents suit. I support to adopt these as WG documents.

cheers,
--satoru

On 2012/01/30, at 20:31, Ole Trøan wrote:

> hi,
> 
> the MAP (Mapping of address and port) design team has now written and published the following sets of drafts.
> 
> the base document (port mapping algorithm):
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-mapping-address-and-port-03
>  http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-mdt-softwire-mapping-address-and-port-03.txt
> 
> the encapsulation document (MAP-E):
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-encapsulation-00
> 
> the translation document (MAP-T):
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-translation-00
> 
> the DHCP option (MAP-DHCP):
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-02
> 
> there is a MAP deployment document coming soon.
> 
> the solution described in this set of documents, are written to satisfy the following from the softwires charter:
>   4. Developments for stateless legacy IPv4 carried over IPv6 
>      - develop a solution motivation document to be published as an RFC 
>      - develop a protocol specification response to the solution 
>        motivation document; this work item will not be taken through 
> 
> in the design team's view, this set of documents are ready to be adopted as working group documents.
> 
> comments?
> 
> for the MAP design team,
> Ole
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires