Re: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07

[Tom Taylor <[e-mail]>]

Actually, you're a little behind on the NATV2-MIB document.
draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib-11 has been replaced by the two documents
   draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-00.txt
and
   draft-perrault-behave-natv2-mib-00.txt

I submitted the latter a couple of days ago. The deprecate draft will 
see a minor update shortly, and there is a bit more work to be done on 
the natv2 draft. We would love to have comments on that one.

In any event, I see an action on myself to look over the Softwire MIB 
documents.

Tom Taylor

On 22/01/2015 1:57 AM, Tina TSOU wrote:
> Dear Sheng et al,
>
> Below are the NAT MIB drafts status.
>
> draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib-11<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib/>        Definitions of Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT)    2014-01-24      Expert Review::Revised I-D Needed (for 175 days)
> WG Document                     Spencer Dawkins
>
> draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-00<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1/>      Deprecation of MIB Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT))       2014-10-19      AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed (for 5 days)
> IETF                    Spencer Dawkins
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Tina
>
> On Jan 22, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Sheng Jiang <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
> This draft did pass the last WGLC. The later modification came from MIB doctor review and the modification of depending document NAT-MIB. This second last WGLC is necessary giving these new modifications. I support the modifications and moving the document forward.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sheng
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Softwires [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Yong Cui
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 8:05 PM
> To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> Cc: Cui 崔勇
> Subject: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07
>
> Hi folks,
>
> This message starts a two week softwire working group last call on
> advancing the draft of DS-Lite MIB as a Standards Track RFC.
>
> After we had the first wglc on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-02,
> there were some major comments. The authors have revised the
> document including the structure and detailed technical contents.
> Now the authors believe that this version has addressed all the
> issues.
>
> The latest version of the draft is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07.txt
>
> Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for
> advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list.
> Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This
> last call will conclude on February 3, 2015.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Yong & Suresh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>