IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Thu, 22 January 2015 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E851AC41F for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:58:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.76
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.76 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7hklddkbt2o4 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:58:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE6221A036F for <softwires@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 22:58:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BOH51227; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:58:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEML430-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.185) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:58:09 +0000
Received: from szxeml557-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.208]) by szxeml430-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.185]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 14:57:27 +0800
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
To: Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07
Thread-Index: AQHQNXKavpBVsJo7XUKW9PIHo+AFhZzLIjkAgACUPsw=
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:57:27 +0000
Message-ID: <20C2DBC7-E11E-45E5-A1FB-12E25B431E65@huawei.com>
References: <8FEE8C7C-C0D3-45DC-97DC-35D56350C172@tsinghua.edu.cn>, <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923B03C3B3@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923B03C3B3@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_20C2DBC7E11E45E5A1FB12E25B431E65huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/vH7SWRlvNMjPRWAKtP6c7ORujjM>
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>, "draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib@tools.ietf.org" <draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib@tools.ietf.org>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>, "draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib@tools.ietf.org>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 06:58:17 -0000

Dear Sheng et al,

Below are the NAT MIB drafts status.

draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib-11<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib/>        Definitions of Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT)    2014-01-24      Expert Review::Revised I-D Needed (for 175 days)
WG Document                     Spencer Dawkins

draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-00<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1/>      Deprecation of MIB Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT))       2014-10-19      AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed (for 5 days)
IETF                    Spencer Dawkins



Thank you,
Tina

On Jan 22, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Sheng Jiang <jiangsheng@huawei.com<mailto:jiangsheng@huawei.com>> wrote:

This draft did pass the last WGLC. The later modification came from MIB doctor review and the modification of depending document NAT-MIB. This second last WGLC is necessary giving these new modifications. I support the modifications and moving the document forward.

Best regards,

Sheng

-----Original Message-----
From: Softwires [mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yong Cui
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 8:05 PM
To: softwires@ietf.org<mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
Cc: Cui 崔勇
Subject: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07

Hi folks,

This message starts a two week softwire working group last call on
advancing the draft of DS-Lite MIB as a Standards Track RFC.

After we had the first wglc on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-02,
there were some major comments. The authors have revised the
document including the structure and detailed technical contents.
Now the authors believe that this version has addressed all the
issues.

The latest version of the draft is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07.txt

Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for
advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list.
Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This
last call will conclude on February 3, 2015.


Thanks,

Yong & Suresh

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org<mailto:Softwires@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org<mailto:Softwires@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email