Re: [Softwires] Stateless implementation plan

Le 2012-02-08 à 12:04, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :

> Hi Remi,
> 
> 4rd would be quite applicable for some UEs, e.g. mobile routers which
> are in charge of a 3G/4G uplink and manage several devices connected
> to them such as in vehicles.

Yes, I think so.

It remains to:
- finalize 4rd
- find mobile operators that understand the potential
- find mobile-OS vendors that support it
Not necessarily a long path IMHO (but not necessarily a fitness trail either).

Regards 
RD

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Behcet
> 
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Rémi Després <despres.remi@laposte.net> wrote:
>> Hi Behcet,
>> 
>> Le 2012-02-08 à 09:46, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
>> 
>>> Hi Cameron,
>>> 4rd solution IMHO is more suitable for a fixed network. CPE in 4rd is
>>> not appropriate to be hosted in a UE.
>>> 
>>> I think your solution 464XLAT's mobile part is way better for your
>>> purposes. There you can put all your IPv4 resources on the PLAT box so
>>> that CLAT box is kept simpler.
>>> 
>>> In 4rd, CPEs have A+P and BR is kept "stateless" these are not so
>>> useful for your purposes, I think.
>> 
>> Note however that:
>> - 464XLAT doesn't support shared IPv4 addresses (while 4rd does)
>> - 4rd over 6rd can work, and therefore offer both IPv6 and shared-address IPv4 on an RFC1918 network, e.g. on a 3GPP IPv4 PDP (while 464XLAT cannot AFAIK).
>> 
>> Regards,
>> RD
>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> 
>>> Behcet
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Are the map and 4rd solutions deployable for existing networks that do not
>>>> have reserves  of ipv4 ?  My assumption is that these solutions target
>>>> existing networks that have meaningful growth and they need a v6 solution.
>>>> 
>>>> If yes, how? Any pointers within the reams of drafts I should look for?
>>>> 
>>>> In my brief and simple skimming, it appears to me that setting up one of
>>>> these solutions would require me to collapse my existing network to harvest
>>>> back the addresses so that they may be redeployed in map.
>>>> 
>>>> What would the deployment process be for an address exhausted network of 10
>>>> million subs with 10% annual growth be?
>>>> 
>>>> Cb
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Softwires mailing list
>>>> Softwires@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Softwires mailing list
>>> Softwires@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires