[lamps] Preparing the shepherd write-up for rfc6844bis

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

IDnits reports the following problems:

idnits 2.16.0 

  Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist :
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

  == The 'Obsoletes: ' line in the draft header should list only the
     _numbers_ of the RFCs which will be obsoleted by this document (if
     approved); it should not include the word 'RFC' in the list.

{{{ Easy to fix, and I would not say anything if this was the only issue. }}}


  -- The draft header indicates that this document obsoletes RFC6844, but the
     abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should.

{{{ Please add a sentence to the Abstract. }}}


  Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references
     to lower-maturity documents in RFCs)

  == Missing Reference: 'STD13' is mentioned on line 194, but not defined

{{{ Perhaps you meant to reference RFC 1035 here. }}}


  ** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 3647

{{{ Can this be moved to an Informational reference? }}}


  ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 5070 (Obsoleted by RFC 7970)

{{{ Is there a reason to not reference RFC 7970? }}}


  ** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 5226 (Obsoleted by RFC 8126)

{{{ Is there a reason to not reference RFC 8126? }}}

Russ