Re: [Spasm] proposed work item
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 20 April 2016 15:01 UTC
Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A0412E087 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v5Aqaw1cwupR for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F48E12B006 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ronin.smetech.net [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B70F2404B; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:01:02 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IeZ0bVgihfde; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:45:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B67F24035; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:01:01 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <571795E5.6080008@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:00:59 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3813FE06-6528-4777-B532-89754072DA61@vigilsec.com>
References: <571795E5.6080008@cisco.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/2e_ERfQRlVnRy4gsambv1aA1x7k>
Cc: spasm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Spasm] proposed work item
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:01:05 -0000
Eliot: I skimmed this draft. How much adoption has there been of IEEE 802.1AR? Given the criteria that Stephen outlined for this group charter, that answer to that question will determine whether it makes it into the first round of the charter. Russ On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > At least for the moment, I'd like to propose a work item that was listed > in Stephen's original note, I believe, which is > draft-lear-ietf-pkix-mud-extension. I say, “at least for the moment” > because we may want to consolidate MUD work elsewhere later. I think > the ADs will want to talk about that at some point. > > Eliot
- [Spasm] proposed work item Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spasm] proposed work item Russ Housley
- Re: [Spasm] proposed work item Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spasm] proposed work item Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spasm] proposed work item Eliot Lear
- Re: [Spasm] proposed work item Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Spasm] proposed work item Jim Schaad