IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] proposed work item

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 11 May 2016 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E323412D73E for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 11:36:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.516
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HsIUsMQ2KqSq for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 11:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE83A12D738 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 11:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4864; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1462991784; x=1464201384; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=HMRu0jC4YzhrcK7KFcU219iahKjd2msj6muFCPpzQV8=; b=IE3aogP2I+UDmXNrJRTwHFVWZF0bJsUszzWUNzwfJD3zq/CGmVq1tNLa ilZD+NpT0YHlaXxVKFhzewOdhYFSJ7TqBiQp5UdnRyUiCSnNeUVcE1JCL PKg/XC8El2DZ63yvUWevi29yOMp8WvzJw0l/jAq0cCoarfOlng/ibf7id g=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AYAwCaejNX/xbLJq1ehA19tDmEdw6BdhcBCoVyAoF1FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RDAQEEAQEBIEsKEQsEFAkWCwICCQMCAQIBFTAGAQwGAgEBiCsOqXyQaQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEPBASKbIc/glkBBJgngymBaIkNiT+FWo9BHgFDg206MokKAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,608,1454976000"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="634577349"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 May 2016 18:36:22 +0000
Received: from [10.61.97.31] (dhcp-10-61-97-31.cisco.com [10.61.97.31]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4BIaM6d024795; Wed, 11 May 2016 18:36:22 GMT
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, spasm@ietf.org
References: <571795E5.6080008@cisco.com> <5733780E.6010209@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <57337BA5.8050801@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 20:36:21 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5733780E.6010209@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CreFeiwJcWpcm3hKtrV4v7hOowhSo5mMo"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/wjzYYYO3h015sfqZ4b24UWnZnQs>
Subject: Re: [Spasm] proposed work item
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 18:36:49 -0000

Hi Stephen,

I'm withdrawing the suggestion.  I'll be consolidating the drafts a bit
and expect the work to continue elsewhere.

Eliot

On 5/11/16 8:21 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 20/04/16 15:44, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> At least for the moment, I'd like to propose a work item that was listed
>> in Stephen's original note, I believe, which is
>> draft-lear-ietf-pkix-mud-extension.  I say, “at least for the moment”
>> because we may want to consolidate MUD work elsewhere later.  I think
>> the ADs will want to talk about that at some point.
> Does anyone else support pursuing the relevant part of MUD in the
> proposed spasm wg?
>
> Thanks,
> S.
>
>> Eliot
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spasm mailing list
>> Spasm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email