IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Spasm] proposed work item

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 20 April 2016 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE92412D74D for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ek-aOyjUokUC for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CB2212D550 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1576; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1461163496; x=1462373096; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version; bh=0ARyrGSgO7ZFs6H/e24EGIIf4G6LJz7lO2VQKT1c+wM=; b=A09xNz9RC3ta+60v855QyvAXvg09+UhZiGFjSYCVzmFIWqzvlL42ieXB BrH32NQIseEig1afMhOJpn9f6zVcSCExKhpkySlvN+LYr6k6RlkPs4IdD tGxeHtWIdsL8NSZid3VHWl08ELjcyROPYOL8cZc2kJc2giAq2gIUYuBR7 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ClBADslBdX/xbLJq1ewHKIHAEBAQEBAWYnhGtVPRYLAgsDAgECAT8ZCAEBiCWdU49dkR8Ij3eCNIJWAQSYD4MogWaJBoFQAYdohVePLWKDajqIdwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,510,1454976000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="635271785"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Apr 2016 14:44:54 +0000
Received: from [10.61.236.65] ([10.61.236.65]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3KEirOB021283 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:44:54 GMT
To: spasm@ietf.org
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <571795E5.6080008@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:44:53 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LL9LDHmStPSj5JqierIHQmiPbqVmMiqo5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/L3fb_wcp6fBFc8vm47ECgUmsrrE>
Subject: [Spasm] proposed work item
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:44:58 -0000

Hi everyone,

At least for the moment, I'd like to propose a work item that was listed
in Stephen's original note, I believe, which is
draft-lear-ietf-pkix-mud-extension.  I say, “at least for the moment”
because we may want to consolidate MUD work elsewhere later.  I think
the ADs will want to talk about that at some point.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email