IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Spasm] proposed work item

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 20 April 2016 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B91E12D659 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jCLONPjK8N0t for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD1A812E0E7 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2621; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1461164925; x=1462374525; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hCShuMvcTuv2Hh48VBiaFZsoQBz5MElSHastOTOME/M=; b=TjxWuNA/CipzyHcX5jqwEqFSz+3YIsb7mfZVG8gcgw3loN8Cg/67RMwr k20Rs0NEfYMNGfBpgQCCvWfsOOqqZU8xS5yjanaPnNWC1bFqzpzcbq0P4 8ltusghR3abUx5XyBLDIxMIBDyyy+52P+olY5geHyzJN7r9iKfiRCmR3W s=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CsBABymhdX/xbLJq1ehAt9u2oXC4VsAoIMAQEBAQEBZieEQgEBBAEBASBLCxALGAkhAgIPAhYwBg0GAgEBiCUOrTyQegEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEPBASKbIc/glYFjVKKPYMogWaJBok5hVePLWKDajowiEcBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,510,1454976000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="637091178"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Apr 2016 15:08:42 +0000
Received: from [10.61.236.65] ([10.61.236.65]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3KF8gCm008174; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:08:42 GMT
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
References: <571795E5.6080008@cisco.com> <3813FE06-6528-4777-B532-89754072DA61@vigilsec.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <57179B79.90608@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:08:41 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3813FE06-6528-4777-B532-89754072DA61@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8WC3lpQpWw4IgvKgN4j9BVX2woEHFhheF"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/eGWdNCbOBiN5C4tpGLXhroj79DE>
Cc: spasm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Spasm] proposed work item
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:08:54 -0000

802.1AR is currently the basis of ANIMA WG work, and it is out there. 
There was also interest in this work expressed at OPSAWG.  The question
is simply where to land it.  I would prefer to have eyes on the work who
know something about RFC 5280 and friends.

On 4/20/16 5:00 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> Eliot:
>
> I skimmed this draft.  How much adoption has there been of IEEE 802.1AR?  Given the criteria that Stephen outlined for this group charter, that answer to that question will determine whether it makes it into the first round of the charter.
>
> Russ
>
>
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> At least for the moment, I'd like to propose a work item that was listed
>> in Stephen's original note, I believe, which is
>> draft-lear-ietf-pkix-mud-extension.  I say, “at least for the moment”
>> because we may want to consolidate MUD work elsewhere later.  I think
>> the ADs will want to talk about that at some point.
>>
>> Eliot
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email