Re: [lamps] LAMPS Re-charter

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 18 March 2021 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DA4F3A2D09 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.346
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.346 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.248, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V6ptun2M0Sa5 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 052D03A2D08 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 07:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 12IEYmBX028579; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:48:39 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=OqvikshqzWJlRYhIGXnSdHX88qHQ+ImZxE3cWoQwmKc=; b=kFUEmr4Ggx5LiPFNhyWdG9xu4SOiqM13QuRI364sqQf74d9/l8taJLVyXcp0gXaKuDqF KabvhQdXV3rPH1uPGvzq6mE1PxczFy1hbQcVBakpXjluJ0aGl/hzZkN0fyaHbMkU0kuO ZHr5Z6XaHSkLTYCywzBUlUpLOu1gbY9/gmsSmWHf4ocbLu5ymjLHEVvhzo8vGePwI5R0 ID0PAEGJdmq7Ac4DPB/gp/+CMPMZY5CCUPZ4JwaNKu/W3wIX6RoC64W91K7xbFWSfWSg DHPFbl0ZJ/xZysIvsHYn79qp5ukPNnBKg4C2qMv4igQUaWL+PhbtP9h41E6e9mfb1Prx MQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a72-247-45-31.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.31] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 378ppmh633-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:48:39 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 12IEZFea029581; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:48:38 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.113]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 37c4w92839-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:48:38 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.121) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:48:37 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.121]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.012; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:48:37 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [lamps] LAMPS Re-charter
Thread-Index: AQHXG3ymVnpM82srXEqhMdHud6wiJaqJ5VQA
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:48:36 +0000
Message-ID: <E21F9B2E-A269-48D9-ABDC-1B10CDBE44E8@akamai.com>
References: <5A22DF7B-BCA5-42F6-BB95-D4F70FDB1996@vigilsec.com> <951CAF0F-7461-4057-B95E-D1F6CAE61D02@vigilsec.com> <4c18a9982cc94df2952d7b2cbae89d99@cert.org> <7B82765F-9C7A-4C4D-B115-A2835B44E6D6@vigilsec.com> <b3fdb1ac051b4ae0ad748782daebead2@cert.org> <ACE141CD-B0B7-45D3-B54F-BE25275A0D25@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <ACE141CD-B0B7-45D3-B54F-BE25275A0D25@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.47.21031401
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E21F9B2EA26948D9ABDC1B10CDBE44E8akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-03-18_07:2021-03-17, 2021-03-18 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=970 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2103180107
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-03-18_07:2021-03-17, 2021-03-18 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=867 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2103180107
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 72.247.45.31) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint3
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/5cIawCg9Qk-ocBoi4QTTPBrzbYM>
Subject: Re: [lamps] LAMPS Re-charter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:48:45 -0000

Maybe put 2&4 adjacent, but this looks like a nice charter.  I’ve never seen 5.b.ii levels  before.  Long live the Harvard Outline. :)

I don’t recall discussion of short-lived certs but I’m sure that flitted by when I was’t looking.