IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Adoption call for draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 25 February 2018 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F253D1267BB for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 23:18:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tzIYbjCeWZjK for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 23:18:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30A631241FC for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 23:18:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id d206so15645011qkb.3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 23:18:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=fK2JLhHHXtg1oPDd7fDicio1gqpJod5TPJ6/HyH/N8w=; b=rbW8XZbKogfgHfl812ArDcpfSPQgud7tc9owBih/1287ppeXfaUOF6wlGwyICHaZNg 7x/jgqorhkeukjtXoSZB+7AvmnJ0j4VOvGnfu9vxmXFPQhvsE3Y92XLwc5IIJ4cB8uC5 Fvtx6B8Yx7T20lq0GlcCEgG4rTP539LgWTBsRbHisWeKiQfQ8RMaE0qnMavOQQHJGHaH 4shM4Fs61jV/nDOtHbUsDcfLgLFCGDAwlyqDrrsUS+9H+sGrbrve4QkF7E6IvHNKgsop DXGzoGXBXy0SWYWEUpjmU7HOPOwu55n/doBUzHcHdKqSjJ0xLLBt7P8hnXl8NtHoSuSe O0uA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=fK2JLhHHXtg1oPDd7fDicio1gqpJod5TPJ6/HyH/N8w=; b=Czb/gT+88+263f1FXF7TUTmPldpe80uPPtoAEPAXUuKm7L2M1rzIS6gJyHLHA7+2nE obujMVgUgmxSEDh+Gm+YYC9HCek0v6mwW7PBYKSuN1V5amhIq1L9te9E1rw9a+ISRoSw /khH0l83Kd/ZtcehdM+7NVbWZFSa85dcRE4YA9T0C90/1kx3mSSvIVyxaShN168/oHP2 hAwXo4bzzDY0SvQqhtSxmZ8c9JxVTKUwMWLSKCc5lM93QDnp4X1FpB4gYsPhxxGdJEoI qe5MviLHHNgiM4cfpm4Z5FNrQDDU9kSk0diXf/mp76kA7DCRgHDrwzJ2XejR+lfpo5CZ a8NQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCBT3y1o7/VaNmKvdq1JrewF2Tha10jFejbE2a4j6gCb5XBg0Oo mgYBWADDGtVXL3XlSBeLzaloyS43
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELt4W8FQ4zzUaw5sJ9Ls/7yEIb5rqFo+SKosd1Q6rvx4gzSK9mMj1gptchGSrHFWssu4NX/RdQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.160.129 with SMTP id j123mr10575211qke.319.1519543107375; Sat, 24 Feb 2018 23:18:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.46] (184-15-230-94.dsl2.chtn.wv.frontiernet.net. [184.15.230.94]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l10sm4029363qta.60.2018.02.24.23.18.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 24 Feb 2018 23:18:26 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15D100)
In-Reply-To: <588FD7CB-1D4D-4EBA-8CC0-B671BF871359@vigilsec.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 02:18:24 -0500
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <36F44DDB-A9BA-4C01-A84C-99301274DF50@gmail.com>
References: <588FD7CB-1D4D-4EBA-8CC0-B671BF871359@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/8LN5j5xPXQ7cu0I85fM3776ysVs>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Adoption call for draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:18:30 -0000

Yes and am signing up for reviews etc. 

Tim

From my high tech gadget

> On Feb 24, 2018, at 14:28, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Should draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification be adopted by the LAMPS WG as the starting point for rfc6844bis?
> 
> Please voice you opinion by March 10th.
> 
> Russ
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email