IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Adoption call for draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 06 March 2018 04:27 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D102C127869 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 20:27:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UehRmSFqPRXo for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 20:27:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6B1A127444 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 20:27:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w264R27f063556 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Mar 2018 21:27:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141] claimed to be [10.20.30.101]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 20:27:29 -0800
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.10r5443)
Message-ID: <5B9ED863-9520-499A-89BF-023F34C09F1F@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <588FD7CB-1D4D-4EBA-8CC0-B671BF871359@vigilsec.com>
References: <588FD7CB-1D4D-4EBA-8CC0-B671BF871359@vigilsec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/K7L0GfOywlncwePs-zHNuJ_1q5U>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Adoption call for draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 04:27:35 -0000

On 24 Feb 2018, at 11:28, Russ Housley wrote:

> Should draft-hoffman-andrews-caa-simplification be adopted by the 
> LAMPS WG as the starting point for rfc6844bis?

Sure, as long as the final document has a careful section on differences 
from RFC 6844.

I will review after it is adopted by the WG.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email