IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of hash-based signature algorithms for certificates to the LAMPS charter

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 07 November 2018 04:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844D0127332 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:03:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aqcQQjPtt2Uj for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:03:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86DAF127148 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 20:03:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id w3-v6so6770677pgs.11 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:03:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=t/3Xi8nohMZLkbp/JVN0jsSwE/pjvNaN6r0oSP2mPw0=; b=UOU3wLiPKIChEWt2eqo/n7Nr6t4e9YcQxxzD0x3evfhXlw8mNk4AXunpRcxEjY+Fr4 2nW5pFaNZAWOMkaUFqxU8oComvf97HOTXCSjVBmTwtpaME7O0yxHqLHqCUkupcnVrH6S C+FcujwR3v1/Fx+nNbiRylCQRI25dd8FZ2F40HTpUzyJ7yF2SEz9sn72qLrrt2j1GIfC Q6lRkZAA+WQp88gwGipU4boMQXk81xvh60uATbmznqbbGRSi9aebwGShKwO85QhZywPB XQGgJuccvl15QeBoo3/eTZJdv8ZBzeu4vw+1Ype3LhGIcreMsEN2VjgxJgG79jGyvDOF zUpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=t/3Xi8nohMZLkbp/JVN0jsSwE/pjvNaN6r0oSP2mPw0=; b=j9HnblxwMAfv0p3MAulJzCXBX2xn9OZt+F2t6UNozLbQel0e86pbv1A+1VWvdEg5xU WktxpvctXjuPJJBG7ff7/UG7ykyFg3BYf1ZZgCNlpzAsHGyix9uZQE/RJUgRtNZAaija EHknIJkli9y6o1NpFAXC9yYRoAfVKLe0dXsafx7Me9oKv5aSPyOVqZoQWOM8eQSFXKqt MMtqdpBDvrk9FZLHJffk5SmLyJsySmB/baVlLUKZRbzwZmoANsaHHOcp3P0mss0Bx0tA loGZpGyB9OZBbbn35+obzR3Ye/0oNEpvJFQcsufoIcGJ+UV8ee4ho/oI6yakNP3593Yl asFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJ4D1yCZlCS4ogqofilIgNLQqOk+fE/7b9Tkh6IM6YRVxN70MEI yApMqpWTtknMAzTd2Mdu4vg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cEmUb7PNCelb9MMzVHq0nG1cj7ndEiPnD/cu2SY0zjbNlkZ85HKY2K1eV0C4TpDKdTT9AKXw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:4926:: with SMTP id w38mr256245pga.353.1541563433166; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:03:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:854c:c2e2:c6ba:7016? ([2001:67c:370:128:854c:c2e2:c6ba:7016]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d16sm16122460pgj.21.2018.11.06.20.03.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Nov 2018 20:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.1 \(3445.101.1\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <DC89076A-826E-46B7-98F1-1AE6031058D5@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 11:03:48 +0700
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, SPASM <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <3516073D-47CE-4E1E-BB58-1D2134C4A99E@gmail.com>
References: <3653FE62-CD11-47D1-A9DB-5C6FF4AD8498@vigilsec.com> <DC89076A-826E-46B7-98F1-1AE6031058D5@akamai.com>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.101.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/94hcnhUj5Ns3JF030F9mY120Rcg>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of hash-based signature algorithms for certificates to the LAMPS charter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 04:03:55 -0000

Same for me

> On 7 Nov 2018, at 10:56, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes in favor, yes would review, unlikely to implement.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email