IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of hash-based signature algorithms for certificates to the LAMPS charter

"Dr. Pala" <madwolf@openca.org> Thu, 08 November 2018 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <madwolf@openca.org>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BFE123FFD for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 03:31:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HK_NAME_DR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M2hc8I_1uNWN for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 03:31:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.katezarealty.com (mail.katezarealty.com [104.168.158.213]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EB6130E46 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 03:31:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mail.katezarealty.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3229D3741017 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:31:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at katezarealty.com
Received: from mail.katezarealty.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.katezarealty.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id rmQESuMbX8BP for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:31:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dhcp-9fa4.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9fa4.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.159.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.katezarealty.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 066EB37407F3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:31:30 -0500 (EST)
To: spasm@ietf.org
References: <3653FE62-CD11-47D1-A9DB-5C6FF4AD8498@vigilsec.com>
From: "Dr. Pala" <madwolf@openca.org>
Message-ID: <43c44f75-9cf8-4567-6c19-a09246bce9fb@openca.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 06:31:28 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3653FE62-CD11-47D1-A9DB-5C6FF4AD8498@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/GyWXx3aljWspwilb33ygRGRC8W8>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of hash-based signature algorithms for certificates to the LAMPS charter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 11:31:39 -0000

Hi Russ, all,

On 11/6/18 10:50 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> The SECDISPATCH WG met on Tuesday afternoon, and they made this recommendation:
>
>>   draft-vangeest-x509-hash-sigs-01 -- re-charter LAMPS WG to accept this draft
> Three questions:
>
> 1) Do you support the addition of this work to the LAMPS charter?
Yes.
>
> 2) If it is added, would you review the document?
Yes.
> 3) If it results in an RFC, would you implement?
Yes - but this might require sometime (and possibly in combination with 
the composite-crypto proposal which we will submit soon).
> Russ & Tim
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email