IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-pkcs12-pbmac1-02

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 26 October 2023 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9BBC17C528 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 13:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kREQYB4Dy4Fu for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 13:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF445C170609 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 13:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22921C261A; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:33:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [96.241.2.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE49C1C249A; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:33:20 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <D33C746C-AEEB-4A19-A5ED-C7D949386F80@sn3rd.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 16:33:10 -0400
Cc: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>, LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <45D7D39D-E675-4061-93E3-74F27557D01A@vigilsec.com>
References: <C61AE8CA-3692-43E0-ACE4-8BB0DEDB6D8B@vigilsec.com> <D33C746C-AEEB-4A19-A5ED-C7D949386F80@sn3rd.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/FKqwsFI9MRojp51baL2SGQ2nxf4>
Subject: Re: [lamps] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-pkcs12-pbmac1-02
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 20:33:23 -0000

Sean:

These can be imported from RFC 6268.

Russ


> On Oct 26, 2023, at 4:28 PM, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
> Hubert,
> 
> Hi! I was poking looking at the ASN.1 in RFC 5911 [0] and 8018 [1] and I think maybe we need to define maca-hMAC-SHA256 / alg-hMAC-SHA256 for the prf field in PBKDF2-params.  Right now there’s only one value for pdf and it’s defined for maca-hMAC-SHA1 / alg-hMAC-SHA1. If it’s not in another RFC, then for RFC 5911 we’d need something like:
> 
> PBKDF2-PRFs ALGORITHM ::= { alg-hMAC-SHA1, alg-hMAC-SHA256, … }
> 
> maca-hMAC-SHA256 MAC-ALGORITHM ::= {
>       IDENTIFIER hMAC-SHA256
>       PARAMS TYPE NULL ARE preferredAbsent
>       IS-KEYED-MAC TRUE
>       SMIME-CAPS {IDENTIFIED BY hMAC-SHA256}
>   }
> 
> spt
> 
> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5911#section-3
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8018#appendix-A.2
> 
>> On Oct 10, 2023, at 14:45, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Title: Use of Password Based Message Authentication Code 1 (PBMAC1) in PKCS #12 Syntax
>> 
>> Authors: H. Kario
>> 
>> Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-pkcs12-pbmac1
>> 
>> Should the LAMPS WG ask the IESG to publish this document as an Informational RFC?  Please respond to this WG last Call by 24 October 2024.
>> 
>> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
>> Russ
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spasm mailing list
>> Spasm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email