Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT)

Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com> Tue, 06 February 2018 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <tinatsou6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5BD12E055; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 07:33:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7dVD3cUVKkD2; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 07:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot0-x234.google.com (mail-ot0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 223DF12D830; Tue, 6 Feb 2018 07:33:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot0-x234.google.com with SMTP id r23so2076503ote.8; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 07:33:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=b2qyZnljsyDOPEWwKiSBViJpU7EXJifwJsyFLm9DArQ=; b=sEIiFO9iHNI6IhKASUIypa0ZYG+2ZYMsRTbeobwo7ad311/POStP8HrQVVF6pTZVMC BpNYgGya4obOVJJmPbtC5g10vtPM/Wb1lmVQTqPP4tcVSUUwmWiQOUx3tvhl1kcD/yno GfmHiNHsvKUveCAEwIEsahGUMqnwYU9HinflWDdjGFoAQcC8XaD415JWZXg8zepPYsaO 3rTdszxTraz+kV9m/j8G9vCvsYnWtLqWiFIiOw/2K6n3B9gw5EsdVj+S2iWh0FYarmGd 16HvSJ1VqQN6wYab7d6MpyDXzZHDFgX/KWBJAvxUYi5bVHsAucJKVdaMWaTqFHSvojiY alWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b2qyZnljsyDOPEWwKiSBViJpU7EXJifwJsyFLm9DArQ=; b=M/4kIj80U/NyoPKLXPuZiJD4NcZrdYFhnlSANZII71mEuDGQDWlEm+eTu63QN3uxJU l7H9WnWW8TR/ItkmsxE6i55oFsbJJbgzKxMjQGs0cxRIwCtIzzczC8Jwh5Z6SD6PQPcq 8RdhQ4muCZp9sTMNVJQ0hAKU72YQMUCZL8VlulYrZ2yoPAekxjl+pm29X4oHE40wieYl Zym12OQBP7KmPWlCnFqva2lOokO7nZ8F1tusiWb0TsyKsHTSYRuAWoojudpWpR/EgSAf GoQidLjkJ+8x4tKu/ZuuI6Oqxbz5JjNbaGwHcYwNgLyVKOoDrkUEs1IwPk0K8+9tydX/ cuzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBoo9LwUrvK2RGV4ST1PWUU5hBJoiwU3AyE8BuHFt2p5zSdGvmR aQgjM0OY+/WibGGNhrWqbCmBW/GV85nHZtxdPNw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227fvQXLF8SvT9DWUbXbDL6KCIE/kefvgeFY+38tAI6Mfee2H27rZImfLTyzniLbN0crGUlCGRhN4aKcAAsb5qs=
X-Received: by 10.157.45.46 with SMTP id v43mr2347782ota.264.1517931194105; Tue, 06 Feb 2018 07:33:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <151566303970.12739.2150770765764492742.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FAADC677-CE13-4A78-9CF3-9B6D29C003F3@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <FAADC677-CE13-4A78-9CF3-9B6D29C003F3@gmail.com>
From: Tina Tsou <tinatsou6@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:33:03 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMS-Z8BUBBz=rovG2G_hyGRb1EKC5MY3QC5pCVPqnqUq1KpDcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Tina Tsou <tina.tsou@arm.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, bruno.decraene@orange.com, draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org, spring-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cfb589e43fa05648ce55e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/-sljffO73s1XpI-rFo7hwhS5feo>
Subject: Re: [spring] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Stacked Tunnels for Source Routing \(STATUS\)." <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2018 15:33:17 -0000

Dear Gaurav,

Please scroll down to see the reply in line.

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 4:54 AM Gaurav Dawra <gdawra.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Beniot for the comments.
>
> Please see inline [Gaurav]
>
> > On Jan 11, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
> >
> > Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc-08: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-msdc/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > OPS DIR review from Tina:
> >
> > I found this document well written to be READY for publication as an
> > informational document.
> >
> > Some nits:
> >
> > 4.2 eBGP Labeled Unicast (RFC8277)
> >
> > Each node peers with its neighbors via a eBGP session
> >
> > should be
> >
> > Each node peers with its neighbors via an eBGP session
> [Gaurav] Will address in next revision.
> >
> > 7.  Addressing the open problems
> >
> > the same could be re-used in context of
> >   other domains as well
> >
> > A period is missing in the end.
> >
> [Gaurav] ACK.
>
> > Are the centralized controller and centralized agent the same components?
> [Gaurav]  Yes in this context.
> >
> > Even though the design in this document is specified for same domain, it
> would
> > be useful to develop an approach for inter-domain without leaking
> intra-domain
> > topology and policy.
> >
> > Have this feature been included or being aligned with carrier grade FIB
> in
> > FD.io VPP https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP ?
> > [Gaurav] Apologies, which specific feature?
>
I meant the technology described by this document.

At FD.io CSIT TOI meeting now, see segment routing is on the list, but
cannot find more detail whether msdc is included.

>
> Cheers,
>
> Gaurav
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spring mailing list
> > spring@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
> --
Thank you, Tina